Peculiarities of Modern Nationalist Messages in Online Political Communication: The Analyses of Donald Trump’s and Jair Bolsonaro’s Election Campaigns

  • Olga V. Novoselova Ural Federal University, Yekaterinburg, Russia; Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary

Abstract

As digitalized election campaigns are a new phenomenon, there are almost no studies defining the peculiarities of modern nationalist messages in online political communication research. This article seeks to identify some communication patterns and recent innovations in delivering online nationalist messages. These patterns are regarded in conflation with nationalist and populist approaches by political leaders during their digital election campaigns. The literature review approach to making generalizations is chosen to explore the articulation of nationalist and populist messages during Donald Trump’s (The United States), and Jair Bolsonaro’s (Brazil) election campaigns. Overall, the study boils down to an analysis of the populist and nationalist signifiers in social media posts, and the degree to which their structures of meaning revolve around the vertical down/up or the horizontal in/out axis. As a result, some common traits of modern nationalist messages in online political communication are identified and future areas of research are proposed.

Author Biography

Olga V. Novoselova, Ural Federal University, Yekaterinburg, Russia; Corvinus University of Budapest, Budapest, Hungary

Olga V. Novoselova is a Senior Lecturer at the Ural Federal University (Russia) and PhD student at Corvinus University of Budapest (Hungary). She received Bachelor Degree in Public Relations from Ural State University and Master Degree in Management from the Ural Federal University. Her most recent publications are: Novoselova, O. V., Britvina, I. B., Savchuk, G. A. The development of new professions: managerial aspects of university training (2016). University Management: Practice and Analysis, 103(3); Novoselova, O. V., Gomez, E. S. R. Developing an International PR Campaign: Pepsi and the Black Eyed Peas on Mexican vs. Russian Markets (2018). Communicology, 6(6), pp. 97–110. Conference paper publications: Peculiarities of International Communications in University Worldwide (2019). Proceedings of ICERI2019 Conference, 11–13th November, Seville, Spain, pp. 10218–10224. Her research interests are: digital marketing, international public relations, cross-cultural communication.

References


  • Aalberg, T., Esser, F., Reinemann, C., Strömbäck, J., & de Vreese, C. H. (Eds.). (2016). Populist Political Communication in Europe. New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315623016

  • Aalberg, T., & de Vreese, C. H. (2016). Comprehending Populist Political Communication. In T. Aalberg, F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Strömbäck, & C. H. de Vreese (Eds.), Populist Political Communication in Europe (pp. 3–11). New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315623016

  • Adriani, R. (2019). Nationalism, Populism and Global Social Media. Glocalism: Journal of Culture, Politics and Innovations, 2, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.12893/gjcpi.2019.2.2

  • Aggio, C. (2014). Campanhas Políticas e Sites para Redes Sociais: Um Estudo sobre o Uso do Twitter na Eleição Presidencial Brasileira de 2010 [Political Campaigns and Social Media Sites: A Study on the Use of Twitter in the 2010 Brazilian Presidential Election]. Tese de Doutorado, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Comunicação e Cultura Contemporâneas. Salvador, BR: Universidade Federal da Bahia.

  • Aggio, C., & Castro, F. (2019, May 15–17). Meu Partido e o Povo: Uma Proposta Teóricometodológica para o Estudo do Populismo como Fórmula de Comunicação Política Seguida de Estudo de Caso do Perfil de Jair Bolsonaro no Twitter [My Party is the People: A Theoretical Methodological Proposal for the Study of Populism as a Political Communication Style Followed by a Case Study of Jair Bolsonaro's Profile on Twitter]. VIII Congresso da Associação Brasileira de Pesquisadores em Comunicação e Política (VIII COMPOLÍTICA), Universidade de Brasília (UnB) Retrieved from: http://ctpol.unb.br/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/gt4_Aggio_Castro.pdf

  • Ahmadian, S., Azarshahi, S., & Paulhus, D. L. (2017). Explaining Donald Trump via Communication Style: Grandiosity, Informality, and Dynamism. Personality and Individual Differences, 107, 49–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.11.018

  • Alcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211

  • Androniciuc, A. I. (2017, May). Online Campaigning In the 2016 USA Elections – A Comparative Approach. SEA – Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, 13, 29–34.

  • Bass, F. M., & Wind, J. (1995). Introduction to the Special Issue: Empirical Generalizations in Marketing. Marketing Science, 14(3), G1–G5. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.14.3.G1

  • Bernecker, K., Wenzler, M., & Sassenberg, K. (2019). Tweeted Anger Predicts County-Level Results of the 2016 United States Presidential Election. International Review of Social Psychology, 32(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.256

  • Bieber, F. (2018). Is Nationalism on the Rise? Assessing Global Trends. Ethnopolitics, 17(5), 519–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2018.1532633

  • Billig, M. (1995). Banal Nationalism. London, UK: Sage.

  • Block, E., & Negrine, R. (2017). The Populist Communication Style: Toward a Critical Framework. International Journal of Communication, 11, 178–197. Retrieved from: https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/5820

  • Bos, L., & Brants, K. (2014). Populist Rhetoric in Politics and Media: A Longitudinal Study of the Netherlands. European Journal of Communication, 29(6), 703–719. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323114545709

  • Braga, S., & Carlomango, M. (2018). Eleições como de costume? Uma análise longitudinal das mudanças provocadas nas campanhas eleitorais brasileiras pelas tecnologias digitais (1998–2016) [Elections as Usual? The Longitudinal Analysis of the Changes Caused by Digital Technologies in the Brazilian Electoral Campaigns (1998–2016)]. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, 26, 7–62. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-335220182601

  • Caiani, M., & della Porta, D. (2011). The Elitist Populism of the Extreme Right: A Frame Analysis of Extreme Right-Wing Discourses in Italy and Germany. Acta Politica, 46(2), 180–202. https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2010.28

  • Canovan, M. (2005). The People. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

  • Carreiro, R., & Matos, E. (2019, May 15–17). Presidente eleito, e agora? Analisando as estratégias de comunicação digital no Twitter do Governo de Jair Bolsonaro [Elected President, So What? Analyzing the Strategies of Digital Communication on Twitter of the Jair Bolsonaro’s Government]. VIII Congresso da Associação Brasileira de Pesquisadores em Comunicação e Política (VIII COMPOLÍTICA), Universidade de Brasília (UnB). Retrieved from: http://ctpol.unb.br/compolitica2019/GT1/gt1_Carreiro_Matos.pdf

  • de Cleen, B. (2016a). Representing “The People”. The Articulation of Nationalism and Populism in the Rhetoric of the Flemish VB. In J. Jamin (Ed.), L’extrême droite en Europe (pp. 223–242). (Idées d'Europe). Brussels: Academia-Bruylant.

  • de Cleen, B. (2016b). The Party of the People versus the Cultural Elite. Populism and Nationalism in Flemish Radical Right Rhetoric about Artists. JOMEC – Journal of Journalism, Media and Cultural Studies, 9. https://doi.org/10.18573/j.2016.10043

  • de Cleen, B. (2017). Populism and Nationalism. In C. Rovira Kaltwasser, P. Taggart, P. Ostiguy, & P. Ochoa Espejo (Eds.), Handbook of populism (pp. 342–362). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198803560.013.18

  • de Cleen, B., & Stavrakakis, Y. (2017). Distinctions and Articulations: A Discourse Theoretical Framework for the Study of Populism and Nationalism. Javnost – The Public, 24(4), 301–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2017.1330083

  • Costa, B. F., & Khudoliy, A. O. (2019). The Relevance of Public Speech in the Presidency of Donald Trump – the US Elections in Analysis. Estudos em Comunicação, 29, 103–126. https://doi.org/10.25768/fal.ec.n29.a07

  • Darwish, K., Magdy, W., & Zanouda, T. (2017). Trump vs. Hillary: What Went Viral During the 2016 US Presidential Election. In G. Ciampaglia, A. Mashhadi, & T. Yasseri (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 10539. Social Informatics. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.

  • Demata, M. (2019). Political Communication and Multimodality: the Facebook Pages of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. In A. Cancellier, A. Barchiesi, M. Anquetil, & A. Francesconi (Eds.), I Linguaggi della Comunicazione Politica: tra Globalizzazione e frontiere linguistiche (pp. 25–46). CLEUP – Cooperativa Libraria Editrice Università di Padova.

  • Engesser, S., Fawzi, N., & Larsson, A. O. (2017). Populist Online Communication: Introduction to the Special Issue. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1279–1292. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328525

  • Enli, G. (2017). Twitter as Arena for the Authentic Outsider: Exploring the Social Media Campaigns of Trump and Clinton in the 2016 US Presidential Election. European Journal of Communication, 32(1), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323116682802

  • Ernst, N., Engesser, S., Büchel, F., Blassnig, S., & Esser, F. (2017). Extreme Parties and Populism: An Analysis of Facebook and Twitter across Six Countries. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1347–1364. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1329333

  • Esser, F., & Pfetsch, B. (2016). Comparing Political Communication: An Update. Challenges to Democracy in the 21st Century, Working Paper, No. 89. Bern, Switzerland: National Centre of Competence in Research–Democracy, Swiss National Science Foundation.

  • Fitzduff, M. (Ed.). (2017). Why Irrational Politics Appeals: Understanding the Allure of Trump. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger, an imprint of ABC-CLIO.

  • Fontes, G. S., Silva, P. F., & Kniess, A. B. (2019, May 15–17). Fake news e fact-checking nas eleições presidenciais de 2018: um estudo qualitativo sobre o projeto Comprova [Fake News and Fact-Checking at 2018 Brazilian Presidential Elections: a Qualitative Study about the Comprova Project]. VIII Congresso da Associação Brasileira de Pesquisadores em Comunicação e Política (VIII COMPOLÍTICA), Universidade de Brasília (UnB). Retrieved from: http://ctpol.unb.br/compolitica2019/GT2/gt2_Fontes_Silva_Kniess.pdf

  • Freeden, M. (1998). Is Nationalism a Distinct Ideology? Political Studies, 46(4), 748–765. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00165

  • Fuchs, Ch. (2020). Communication and Capitalism. A Critical Theory. London: University of Westminster Press.

  • Gerbaudo, P. (2018). Social Media and Populism: An Elective Affinity? Media, Culture & Society, 40(5), 745–753. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718772192

  • Gonawela, A., Pal, J., Thawani, U., van der Vludt, E., Out, W., & Chandra, P. (2018). Speaking Their Mind: Populist Style and Antagonistic Messaging in the Tweets of Donald Trump, Narendra Modi, Nigel Farage, and Geert Wilders. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 27, 293–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-018-9316-2

  • Hagen, L., Falling, M., Lisnichenko, O., Elmadany, A. A., Mehta, P., Abdul-Mageed, M., Costakis, J., & Keller, T. E. (2019). Emoji Use in Twitter White Nationalism Communication. CSCW '19: Conference Companion Publication of the 2019 on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 201–205. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311957.3359495

  • Hameleers, M., Bos, L., & de Vreese, C. H. (2016). The Netherlands: A Heartland Full of Insights into Populist Communication. In T. Aalberg, F. Esser, C. Reinemann, J. Strömbäck, & C. H. de Vreese (Eds.), Populist Political Communication in Europe (pp. 138–150). New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315623016

  • Hameleers, M., Bos, L., Fawzi, N., Reinemann, C., Andreadis, I., Corbu, N., …, Weiss-Yaniv, N. (2018). Start Spreading the News: A Comparative Experiment on the Effects of Populist Communication on Political Engagement in Sixteen European Countries. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(4), 517–538. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161218786786

  • Harris, H. (2001). Content Analysis of Secondary Data: A Study of Courage in Managerial Decision Making. Journal of Business Ethics, 34, 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012534014727

  • van Hooft, P. (2016). The Renationalisation of Foreign Policy and International Order. Atlantisch Perspectief, 3, 30–33.

  • Hyun, K. D., & Kim, J. (2015). The Role of New Media in Sustaining the Status Quo: Online Political Expression, Nationalism, and System Support in China. Information, Communication & Society, 18(7), 766–781, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.994543

  • Iasulaitis, S., & Vieira, A. (2019, May 15–17). Quando o ataque é o programa: as estratégias de campanha de Donald Trump e de Jair Bolsonaro no Twitter [When Attacking Becomes the Program: Donald Trump and Jair Bolsonaro’s Campaign Strategies on Twitter]. VIII Congresso da Associação Brasileira de Pesquisadores em Comunicação e Política (VIII COMPOLÍTICA), Universidade de Brasília (UnB). Retrieved from: http://ctpol.unb.br/compolitica2019/GT4/gt4_Iasulaytis_Vieira.pdf

  • Ituassu, A., Lifschitz, S., Capone, L., & Mannheimer, V. (2019, May 15–17). De Donald Trump a Jair Bolsonaro: democracia e comunicação política digital nas eleições de 2016, nos Estados Unidos, e 2018, no Brasil [From Donald Trump to Jair Bolsonaro: Democracy and Digital Political Communication in the 2016 Elections in the United States and in 2018 in Brazil]. VIII Congresso da Associação Brasileira de Pesquisadores em Comunicação e Política (VIII COMPOLÍTICA), Universidade de Brasília (UnB). Retrieved from: http://ctpol.unb.br/compolitica2019/GT4/gt4_Ituassu_et_al.pdf

  • Jagers, J., & Walgrave, S. (2007). Populism as Political Communication Style: An Empirical Study of Political Parties’ Discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research, 46(3), 319–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00690.x

  • Kagan, R. (2018, September 23). “America First” Has Won. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/23/opinion/trumpforeign-policy-america-first.html

  • Kellner, D. (2016). American Nightmare: Donald Trump, Media Spectacle, and Authoritarian Populism. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

  • Kohn, H. (1944). The Idea of Nationalism. New York: Macmillan.

  • Kriesi, H. (2014). The Populist Challenge. West European Politics, 37(2), 361–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2014.887879

  • Laclau, E. (2005). On Populist Reason. London: Verso.

  • Lee, J., & Lim, Y., (2016). Gendered Campaign Tweets: The Cases of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. Public Relations Review, 42(5), 849–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.07.004

  • Lima, P. C. (2019, May 15–17). Cenário humorístico nas eleições presidenciais de 2018: Uma análise dos eventos contra Jair Bolsonaro no Facebook [Humoristic Scenario in the Presidential Elections of 2018: An Analysis of the Events against Jair Bolsonaro on Facebook]. VIII Congresso da Associação Brasileira de Pesquisadores em Comunicação e Política (VIII COMPOLÍTICA), Universidade de Brasília (UnB). Retrieved from: http://ctpol.unb.br/compolitica2019/GT4/gt4_Lima.pdf

  • Loureiro, E. R. l., & Casadei, E. B. (2019, May 15–17). “Isso a Globo não mostra”: dimensões afetivas das notícias falsas no debate sobre o descrédito da imprensa tradicional [“Globo Doesn’t Show It”: Affective Dimensions of False News in the Discredit of the Traditional Press Debate]. VIII Congresso da Associação Brasileira de Pesquisadores em Comunicação e Política (VIII COMPOLÍTICA), Universidade de Brasília (UnB). Retrieved from: http://ctpol.unb.br/compolitica2019/GT4/gt4_Loureiro_Casadei.pdf

  • Magalhães, L., & Veiga, L. (2019, May 15–17). Do Facebook às urnas: Big Data e modelos de previsão eleitoral a partir da “Issue Ownership Theory” e do engajamento online nas eleições presidenciais de 2018 no Brasil [From Facebook to the URNS: Big Data and Election Forecast Models from the “Issue Ownership Theory” and Online Engagement in the 2018 Presidential Elections in Brazil]. VIII Congresso da Associação Brasileira de Pesquisadores em Comunicação e Política (VIII COMPOLÍTICA), Universidade de Brasília (UnB). Retrieved from: http://ctpol.unb.br/compolitica2019/GT6/gt6_Magalhaes_Veiga.pdf

  • Malala, J. N., & Amienyi, O. P. (2018). Mining for Focus and Priorities in Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton’s Daily Tweets during the 2016 U.S. General Elections. International Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science (IJITCS), 10(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijitcs.2018.03.01

  • Malhotra, N. K. (1996). Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

  • Mazzoleni, G., & Bracciale, R. (2018). Socially Mediated Populism: The Communicative Strategies of Political Leaders on Facebook. Palgrave Communications, 4, 50. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0104-x

  • Mény, Y., & Surel, Y. (2000). Par le Peuple, pour le Peuple: le Populisme et les Démocraties [By the People, for the People: Populism and Democracies]. Paris: Fayard.

  • Moffitt, B. (2016). The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

  • Mudde, C. (2004). The Populist Zeitgeist. Government & Opposition, 39(4), 541–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x

  • Mudde, C. (2007). Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492037

  • Muller, J.-W. (2019). False Flags: The Myth of the Nationalist Resurgence. Foreign Affairs, 98(2), 35–41. Retrieved from: https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/fora98&div=31&g_sent=1&casa_token=&collection=journals

  • Murta, F., Magalhães, L., & Pimentel, R. (2019, May 15–17). Social big data, eleições e Facebook: Indícios digitais de previsão eleitoral aplicados ao pleito presidencial de 2018 no Brasil [Social Big Data, Elections and Facebook: Digital Traces about Electoral Prevision Applied on the Brazilian Presidential Elections in 2018]. VIII Congresso da Associação Brasileira de Pesquisadores em Comunicação e Política (VIII COMPOLÍTICA), Universidade de Brasília (UnB). Retrieved from: http://ctpol.unb.br/compolitica2019/GT2/gt2_Murta_Magalhaes_Pimentel.pdf

  • Nai, A., & Maier, J. (2018). Perceived Personality and Campaign Style of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. Personality and Individual Differences, 121, 80–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.09.020

  • Nair, P., & Sharma, S. (2017, January) Populism Finds the Way: Trump, Pollsters and the People's Choice. Mainstream, Vol. LV, No. 1. New Delhi. Retrieved from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3062500

  • Obschonka, M., Stuetzer, M., Rentfrow, P. J., Lee, N., Potter, J., & Gosling, S. D. (2018). Fear, Populism, and the Geopolitical Landscape: The “Sleeper Effect” of Neurotic Personality Traits on Regional Voting Behavior in the 2016 Brexit and Trump Elections. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(3), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618755874

  • Oh, C., & Kumar, S. (2017). How Trump Won: The Role of Social Media Sentiment in Political Elections. 21st Pacific-Asia conference on information systems (PACIS 2017), Proceedings, 48. Retrieved from: https://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2017/48/

  • Passos de Azevedo, D. (2019, May 15–17). A comunicação populista online: análise das estratégias de comunicação política dos principais candidatos à presidência do Brasil no Facebook durante as eleições de 2018 [Online Populist communication: An Analysis of Political Communication Strategies of the Main Presidential Candidates on Facebook during the 2018 Brazilian Elections]. VIII Congresso da Associação Brasileira de Pesquisadores em Comunicação e Política (VIII COMPOLÍTICA), Universidade de Brasília (UnB). Retrieved from: http://ctpol.unb.br/compolitica2019/GT2/gt2_Azevedo.pdf

  • Persily, N. (2017). The 2016 U.S. Election: Can Democracy Survive Internet? Journal of Democracy, 28(2), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2017.0025

  • Piaia, V., & Alves, M. (2019, May 15–17). Abrindo a caixa preta: Análise exploratória da rede Bolsonarista no WhatsApp [Opening the Black Box: Exploratory Analysis of the Bolsonarista Network in WhatsApp]. VIII Congresso da Associação Brasileira de Pesquisadores em Comunicação e Política (VIII COMPOLÍTICA), Universidade de Brasília (UnB). Retrieved from: http://ctpol.unb.br/compolitica2019/GT2/gt2_Piaia_Alves.pdf

  • Pybus, J. (2019). Trump, the First Facebook President: Why Politicians Need Our Data Too. In C. Happer, A. Hoskins, & W. Merrin (Eds.), Trump’s Media War (pp. 227–240). Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Rooduijn, M., (2014). The Mesmerizing Message: The Diffusion of Populism in Public Debates in Western European Media. Political Studies, 62(4), 726–744. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12074

  • Rothwell, J. T., & Diego-Rosell, P. (2016). Explaining Nationalist Political Views: The Case of Donald Trump. Draft Working Paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2822059

  • Rowland, R. (2019). The Populist and Nationalist Roots of Trump's Rhetoric. Rhetoric and Public Affairs, 22(3), 343–388. https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.22.3.0343

  • Santos, K., Nehrer, F., Minervini, F., Machado, M. F. P., & Negrão, K. (2019, May 15–17). Populismo no Youtube: elementos materiais e retórica na Bolsonaro TV [Populism on Youtube: Material and Rethorical Elements at Bolsonaro TV]. VIII Congresso da Associação Brasileira de Pesquisadores em Comunicação e Política (VIII COMPOLÍTICA), Universidade de Brasília (UnB). Retrieved from: http://ctpol.unb.br/compolitica2019/GT2/gt2_Santos_et_al.pdf

  • Schertzer, R., & Woods, E. (2020). #Nationalism: The Ethno-Nationalist Populism of Donald Trump’s Twitter Communication. Ethnic and Racial Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2020.1713390

  • Shear, M., & Haberman, M. (2019, March 19). For Trump, Brazil’s President Is Like Looking in the Mirror. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/19/us/politics/bolsonaro-trump.html

  • Sheranova, A. (2018). Why Populism and Nationalism is a Successful Combination? A Theoretical Explanation. Politikatudomány Online, spec., 1–8. Retrieved from: http://unipub.lib.uni-corvinus.hu/4076/1/Arzuu-Sheranova_populism-and-nationalism_polsci-online-special-issue_2018.pdf

  • Srinivasan, S. M., Sangwan, R. S., Neill, C. J., & Zu, T. (2019). Power of Predictive Analytics: Using Emotion Classification of Twitter Data for Predicting the 2016 U.S. Presidential Elections. The Journal of Social Media in Society Spring, 8(1), 211–230. Retrieved from: https://www.thejsms.org/tsmri/index.php/TSMRI/article/view/477

  • Stavrakakis, Y. (2005). Religion and Populism in Contemporary Greece. In F. Panizza (Ed.). Populism and the Mirror of Democracy (pp. 224–249). London: Verso.

  • Stavrakakis, Y., & Katsambekis, G. (2014). Left-Wing Populism in the European Periphery: The Case of SYRIZA. Journal of Political Ideologies, 19(2), 119–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2014.909266

  • Stewart, A. (1969). The Social Roots. In G. Ionescu, & E. Gellner (Eds.), Populism. Its Meanings and National Characteristics (pp. 180–195). London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.

  • Tadic, D. P., Ratkic, H., & Suput, B. (2017, April). Comparative Analysis of Marketing Communication Strategy on Social Networks: Case Study of Presidential Candidates Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. In L. Yongqiang, A. Hunjet, A. Roncevic (Eds.), Proceedings of 20th International Scientific Conference “Economic and Social Development” (pp. 372–380). Prague.

  • de la Torre, C. (1992). The Ambiguous Meanings of Latin American Populisms. Social Research, 59(2), 385–414. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40970698

  • Trujillo-Pagán, N. (2018). Crossed out by LatinX: Gender Neutrality and Genderblind Sexism. Latino Studies, 16, 396–406. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41276-018-0138-7

  • del Valle, M. E., Wanless-Berk, A., Gruzd, A., & Mai, Ph. (2018, July). Unpredictably Trump? Predicting Clicktivist-like Actions on Trump’s Facebook Posts During the 2016 U.S. Primary Election. In SMSociety '18: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Social Media and Society (pp. 64–70). Denmark. https://doi.org/10.1145/3217804.3217898

  • Vitorino, M. M. (2019, May 15–17). O eleitor conectado: Perfil e consumo de conteúdo nas eleições 2018 [The Connected Voter: Profile and Content Consumption in the Brazilian 2018 Elections]. VIII Congresso da Associação Brasileira de Pesquisadores em Comunicação e Política (VIII COMPOLÍTICA), Universidade de Brasília (UnB). Retrieved from: http://ctpol.unb.br/compolitica2019/GT2/gt2_Vitorino.pdf

  • de Vreese, C. H., Esser, F., Aalberg, T., Reinemann, C., & Stanyer, J. (2018). Populism as an Expression of Political Communication Content and Style: A New Perspective. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(4), 423–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161218790035

  • Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic Content Analysis. London, UK: Sage.

  • Whitehead, A. L., Perry, S. L., & Baker, J. O. (2018). Make America Christian Again: Christian Nationalism and Voting for Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election. Sociology of Religion, 79(2), 147–171. https://doi.org/10.1093/socrel/srx070

  • Woolley, S. C., & Guilbeault, D. R. (2017). Computational Propaganda in the United States of America: Manufacturing Consensus Online. In Computational Propaganda Research Project, Working Paper No. 2017.5. Retrieved from: https://blogs.oii.ox.ac.uk/politicalbots/wp-content/uploads/sites/89/2017/06/Comprop-USA.pdf

  • Yaquba, U., Chunb, S. A., Atluria, J., & Vaidyaa, J. (2017). Analysis of Political Discourse on Twitter in the Context of the 2016 US Presidential Elections. Government Information Quarterly, 34(4), 613–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.11.001

  • Yates, H. E. (2019). The Politics of Spectacle and Emotion in the 2016 Presidential Campaign. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Pivot. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15804-0

Published
2020-10-09
How to Cite
Novoselova, O. (2020). Peculiarities of Modern Nationalist Messages in Online Political Communication: The Analyses of Donald Trump’s and Jair Bolsonaro’s Election Campaigns. Changing Societies & Personalities, 4(3), 350–371. doi:10.15826/csp.2020.4.3.105