Informal Sperm Donation in Russia
Rising infertility across the globe has created a growing demand for assisted reproductive technologies (ART). In recent years, apart from sperm donation in formal settings such as fertility clinics, informal donation practices have emerged and spread across Russia. These reproductive donation practices have become possible due to the development of social networks and private online platforms. We conducted a pilot study (eleven semi-structured interviews) of the informal sperm donation in Russia and analyzed donor-recipient interactions, donors’ expectations and experiences of finding recipients online. We focus on donors' motivations and on the meanings, which donors invest in this practice that consumes significant resources on their part (medical tests and artificial insemination costs, travel and accommodation expenses, sometimes mutually agreed financial support of future offspring). We interpreted the practices that coalesced around informal donation from the perspective of symbolic interactionism, because it allowed us to showcase how actors reflected on and formulated the meanings of their actions in the absence of externally imposed rules (legal regulations, established moral conventions). Since informal donation practices do not fit into the traditional schemes of interpretation, such research requires the actors involved in informal donation either to create their own schemes or to modify the existing conceptual frames in creative ways. The study shows that informal donors do not only provide their genetic material but also spend time and invested considerable resources to ensure their procreation, including eventual financial support of the child. At the same time, these men are not interested in marital relations or paternal relations with their offspring. Thus, the informal sperm donors do not associate the parental project with traditional family and its values. We conclude that ART engendered a new phenomenon, which might be described as extramarital reproduction. Assisted reproduction outside marriage gains footing in Russia and requires more detailed further study.
- Agee, J. (2009). Developing qualitative research questions: a reflective process. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 22(4), 431–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390902736512
- Bay, B., Larsen, P. B., Kesmodel, U. S., & Ingerslev, H. J. (2014). Danish sperm donors across three decades: motivations and attitudes. Fertility and Sterility, 101(1), 252–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.09.013
- Blyth, E., & Frith, L. (2009). Donor-conceived people’s access to genetic and biographical history: an analysis of provisions in different jurisdictions permitting disclosure of donor identity. International Journal of Law, Policy, and the Family, 23(2), 174–191. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebp002
- Bossema, E. R., Janssens, P. M. W., Treucker, R. G. L., Landwehr, F., van Duinen, K., Nap, A. W., & Geenen, R. (2014). An inventory of reasons for sperm donation in formal versus informal settings. Human Fertility, 17(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.3109/14647273.2014.881561
- Freeman, T., Jadva, V., Tranfield, E., & Golombok, S. (2016). Online sperm donation: a survey of the demographic characteristics, motivations, preferences and experiences of sperm donors on a connection website. Human Reproduction, 31(9), 2082–2089. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew166
- Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy: sexuality, love and eroticism in modern societies. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/72.1.271
- Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.
- Health Canada. (2011, August 29). Potential dangers of using donor semen from questionable sources. Government of Canada. http://healthycanadians.gc.ca/recall-alert-rappel-avis/hc-sc/2011/13536a-eng.php
- Kelly, F. (2009). (Re)forming parenthood: The assignment of legal parentage within planned lesbian families. Ottawa Law Review, 40, 185–222. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1683581
- Kelly, F. (2010). An alternative conception: The legality of home insemination under Canada’s Assisted Human Reproduction Act. Canadian Journal of Family Law, 26(1), 149–170.
- Lavoie, K., Côté, I., & de Montigny, F. (2018). Assisted reproduction in the digital age: Stories of Canadian sperm donors offering their gametes online via introduction websites. Journal of Men’s Studies, 26(2), 184–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/1060826517737047
- O poriadke ispol'zovaniia vspomogatel'nykh reproduktivnykh tekhnologii, protivopokazaniiakh i ogranicheniiakh k ikh primeneniiu [On the procedure of the use of assisted reproduction technologies, contraindications and limitations of their application]. The Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 803н (2020, July 31). http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001202010190041
- Polyakova, I. G. (2020). Sotsial'no-psikhologicheskii portret i osobennosti motivatsii donora spermy na bezvozmezdnoi osnove [Social-psychological profile and motivation of altruistic sperm donors]. Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, 56, 184–193. https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/56/18
- Poupart, J. (2011). Tradition de Chicago et interactionnisme: des méthodes qualitatives à la sociologie de la déviance [The Chicago tradition and interactionism: Qualitative methods for a sociology of deviance]. Recherches Qualitatives, 30(1), 178–199.
- Ravelingien, A., Provoost, V., & Pennings, G. (2016). Creating a family through connection websites and events: ethical and social issues. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 33(4), 522–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.07.004
- Riggs, D. W., & Russell, L. (2011). Characteristics of men willing to act as sperm donors in the context of identity-release legislation. Human Reproduction, 26(1), 266–272. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deq314
- Ripper, M. (2008). Australian sperm donors: Public image and private motives of gay, bisexual and heterosexual donors. Health Sociology Review, 17(3), 313–325. https://doi.org/10.5172/hesr.4184.108.40.2063
- Sobande, F., Mimoun, L., & Torres, L. T. (2020). Soldiers and superheroes needed! Masculine archetypes and constrained bodily commodification in the sperm donation market. Marketing Theory, 20(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593119847250