Urban Identities in Russian Cities and the Prospects of Their “Smart” Development


This article deals with the urban identity and its connection with the urban dwellers’ willingness to take part in the processes of decisionmaking concerning the future of their cities, their rejection, or, on the contrary, acceptance of the vision of “smart” development promoted by city leaders. The study gives special attention to the gap between the citizens’ perceptions of their cities and the ideal image of their city (perception-expectation gap). The study provides an overview of the contemporary approaches to the concept of “smart city”, and approaches to urban governance and city identity. The study focused on three Russian cities—Tyumen, Tobolsk and Khanty-Mansiysk, located in Tyumen region in Western Siberia. Our surveys were conducted in November 2020 and involved the residents of these cities aged 18 to 70. In total, 877 people were surveyed in Tyumen, 443 people in Tobolsk and 498 people in Khanty-Mansiysk. The questionnaire, which was specially designed for this study, was aimed to measure the residents’ level of attachment to their cities and their perception-expectation gap. Significant differences were revealed between the cities in terms of the strength of their residents’ urban identity, their emotional attachment to their cities, and expectations about their further development. We found that the larger is the perception-expectation gap, the less emotionally attached the citizens are to their cities and the less committed they are to contributing to its future development and prosperity. These research findings can be of interest to urban policy-makers, regional and national governments. The proposed research methodology can be adapted and/or expanded for further cross-city and cross-country analysis.

Author Biographies

Natalya A. Kostko, Tyumen State University, Tyumen, Russia

Natalya A. Kostko, Doctor of Sciences (Sociology), Professor of the General and Economic Sociology Department at Tyumen State University. Her research focuses on urban sociology and sociology of governance. Her first (Candidate of Sciences) dissertation’s title was “Forecast-Normative Model of the Social Infrastructure of the City of Tyumen”. Her second (Doctor of Sciences) dissertation’s title was “Forecast-Normative Design in the Social Governance System of Regional Development”. She teaches courses “Smart City: Social Aspects” and “Qualitative Methods of Sociological Research” for undergraduate students.

Irina F. Pecherkina, Tyumen State University, Tyumen, Russia

Irina F. Pecherkina, Candidate of Sciences (Sociology), a lecturer at the Management and Business Department, Tyumen State University. Her research focuses on sociology of governance, urban sociology, and sociology of the youth. Her dissertation’s title was “Education and Work in the System of Value Goals of the Youth”. Currently, she teaches courses “Methodology and Technique of Sociological Research”, “Corporate Staff Management”, and “Staff Management” for undergraduate students.


  • Albino, V., Berardi U., & Dangelico, R. M. (2015). Smart cities: definitions, dimensions, performance, and initiatives. Journal of Urban Technology, 22(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2014.942092

  • Angelidou, M., & Psaltoglou, A. (2017). An empirical investigation of social innovation initiatives for sustainable urban development. Sustainable Cities and Society, 33, 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.05.016

  • Atkinson, R. (2019). The Small Towns conundrum: What do we do about them? Regional Statistics, 9(2), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.15196/RS090201

  • Baculáková, K. (2020). Selected aspects of smart city concepts: position of Bratislava. Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, 15(3), 68–80. http://www.um.ase.ro/no153/4.pdf

  • Batty, M. (2013). The new science of cities. The MIT Press.

  • Bibri, S. E., & Krogstie, J. (2019). Generating a vision for smart sustainable cities of the future: a scholarly backcasting approach. European Journal of Futures Research, 7, Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40309-019-0157-0

  • Biczyńska, E. (2019). The Smart City of Medellín, its achievements and potential risks. Urban Development Issues, 62(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.2478/udi-2019-0011

  • Borén, T., Grzyś, P., & Young, C. (2020). Intra-urban connectedness, policy mobilities and creative city-making: national conservatism vs. urban (neo)liberalism. European Urban and Regional Studies, 27(3), 246–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776420913096

  • Bourdieu, P. (1989). Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory, 7(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.2307/202060

  • Bramwell, A. (2020). Innovation and the “ordinary” city? Urban policy making in a digital age. PS: Political Science & Politics, 53(1), 15–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S104909651900132X

  • Brenner, N. (2009). What is critical urban theory? City: Analysis of Urban Change, Theory, Action, 13(2–3), 198–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810902996466

  • Caprotti, F., & Cowley R. (2019). Varieties of smart urbanism in the UK: Discursive logics, the state and local urban context. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 44(3), 587–601. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12284

  • Cardullo, P., & Kitchin, R. (2019). Being a ‘citizen’ in the smart city: up and down the scaffold of smart citizen participation in Dublin, Ireland. GeoJournal, 84(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-018-9845-8

  • Coletta, C., Heaphy, L., & Kitchin, R. (2019). From the accidental to articulated smart city: The creation and work of ‘Smart Dublin’. European Urban and Regional Studies, 26(4), 349–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776418785214

  • Crouch, C., & Le Galès, P. (2012). Cities as national champions? Journal of European Public Policy, 19(3), 405–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.640795

  • da Cruz, N. F., Rode, P., & McQuarrie, M. (2019). New urban governance: A review of current themes and future priorities. Journal of Urban Affairs, 41(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2018.1499416

  • D'Ambrosio, P. J. (2019). From present to presentation: A philosophical critique of Hartmut Rosa’s “situational identity”. Time & Society, 28(3), 1061–1083. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0961463X18787059

  • Deakin, M. (2014). Smart cities: the state-of-the-art and governance challenge. Triple Helix, 1, Article 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40604-014-0007-9

  • Delanty, G. (2012). A cosmopolitan approach to the explanation of social change: social mechanisms, processes, modernity. The Sociological Review, 60(2), 333–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02076.x

  • Drobizheva, L. M. (2018). Rossiiskaia identichnost': diskussii v politicheskom prostranstve i dinamika massovogo soznaniia [Russian identity: discussions in the political space and dynamics of mass consciousness]. Polis. Political Studies, 5, 100–115. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2018.05.09

  • Drozdova, Iu. A. (2019). Resursnyi podkhod v issledovanii territorial'nykh obshchnostei [Resource approach in studying territorial communities]. Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology (Vestnik instituta sotziologii), 10(1), 76–98. https://doi.org/10.19181/vis.2019.28.1.557

  • Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., Kalasek, R., Pichler-Milanovic, N., & Meijers, E. (2007). Smart cities: Ranking of European medium-sized cities. Centre of Regional Science, Vienna University of Technology. http://www.smart-cities.eu/download/smart_cities_final_report.pdf

  • Gornova, G. V. (2018). Struktura gorodskoi identichnosti [Structure of urban identity]. Review of Omsk State Pedagogical University: Humanitarian Research, 3(20), 14–16. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=36565833

  • Greenfield, A. (2013). Against the smart city. Do Projects.

  • Grisel, M., & van de Waart, F. (Eds.). (2011). Multilevel urban governance or the art of working together: methods, instruments and practices. European Urban Knowledge Network.

  • Hollands, R. G. (2015.) Critical interventions into the corporate smart city. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu011

  • Jabareen, Y., & Eizenberg, E. (2021). Theorizing urban social spaces and their interrelations: New perspectives on urban sociology, politics, and planning. Planning Theory, 20(3), 211–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095220976942

  • Joss, S., Cook, M., & Dayot, Y. (2017). Smart cities: Towards a new citizenship regime? A discourse analysis of the British smart city standard. Journal of Urban Technology, 24(4), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2017.1336027

  • Kitchin, R. (2014). The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal, 79(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-013-9516-8

  • Kolodii, N. A., Ivanova, V. S., & Goncharova, N. A. (2020). Umnyi gorod: osobennosti kontseptsii, spetsifika adaptatsii k rossiiskim realiiam [Smart city: The concept and its adaptation to the Russian context]. Sotsiologicheskiy Zhurnal = Sociological Journal, 26(2), 102–123. https://doi.org/10.19181/socjour.2020.26.2.7268

  • Luque-Ayala, A., & Marvin, S. (2015). Developing a critical understanding of smart urbanism? Urban studies, 52(12), 2105–2116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015577319

  • Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of the City. The MIT Press.

  • McFarlane, C., & Söderström, O. (2017). On alternative smart cities: From a technology-intensive to a knowledge-intensive smart urbanism. City: Analysis of Urban Change, Theory, Action, 21(3–4), 312–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2017.1327166

  • Morozova, E. V., Miroshnichenko, I. V., & Semenenko, I. S. (2020). Razvitie sel'skikh mestnykh soobshchestv: potentsial politiki identichnosti [Identity Policies in Rural Local Community Development in Russia]. Polis. Political Studies, 3, 56–77. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2020.03.05

  • Myeong, S., Kim, Y., & Ahn, M. J. (2021). Smart city strategies—technology push or culture pull? A case study exploration of Gimpo and Namyangju, South Korea. Smart Cities, 4(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities4010003

  • Raco, M. (2018). Critical urban cosmopolitanism and the governance of urban diversity in European cities. European Urban and Regional Studies, 25(1), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776416680393

  • Radina, N. K. (2015). Gorod v prostranstve i vremeni: Problemy territorial'noi identichnosti v kontekste sotsial'no-ekonomicheskikh izmenenii [City in space and time: problems of territorial identity in the context of socio-economic changes]. DECOM. https://www.hse.ru/data/2016/01/19/1138144361/RADINA.TEXT.pdf

  • Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2018). The revenge of the places that don’t matter (and what to do about it). Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(1), 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsx024

  • Rosa, H. (2013). Social acceleration: a new theory of modernity (J. Trejo-Mathys, Trans.). Columbia University Press. (Originally published in German 2005)

  • Schindler, S., & Silver, J. (2019). Florida in the Global South: How eurocentrism obscures global urban challenges—and what we can do about it. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 43(4), 794–805. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12747

  • Scott, A. J. (2008). Resurgent metropolis: Economy, society and urbanization in an interconnected world. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(3), 548–564. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00795.x

  • Shelton, T., Zook, M., & Wiig, A. (2015). The ‘actually existing smart city’. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 8(1), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu026

  • Smirnyagin, L. V. (2016). Evoliutsiia Mesta v khode «proizvodstva prostranstva» [Evolution of Place in context of the "production of space"]. In O. Iu. Malinova (Ed.), Simvolicheskaia politika: Sotsial'noe konstruirovanie prostranstva [Symbolic politics: The social construction of space] (Vol. 4, pp. 84–105). INION RAN.

  • Terlouw, K. (2009). Rescaling regional identities: Communicating thick and thin regional identities. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism, 9(3), 452–464. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-9469.2009.01064.x

  • Terlouw, K. (2012). From thick to thin regional identities? GeoJournal, 77(5), 707–721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-011-9422-x

  • Tikhonov, A. V., & Bogdanov, V. S. (2020). Ot «umnogo regulirovaniia» k «umnomu upravleniiu»: sotsial'naia problema tsifrovizatsii obratnykh sviazei [From “smart regulation” to “smart management”: social issue of feedback digitalization]. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniia, 1, 74–81. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250008325-0

  • van Houtum, H., & Lagendijk, A. (2001). Contextualising regional identity and imagination in the construction of polycentric urban regions: The cases of the Ruhr Area and the Basque Country. Urban Studies, 38(4), 747–767. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980120035321

  • Vanolo, A. (2014). Smartmentality: The smart city as disciplinary strategy. Urban Studies, 51(5), 883–898. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013494427

  • Vanolo, A. (2016). Is there anybody out there? The place and role of citizens in tomorrow’s smart cities. Futures, 82, 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2016.05.010

  • Veselova, A. O., Khatskelevich, A. N., & Ezhova, L. S. (2018). Perspektivy sozdaniya «umnyh gorodov» v Rossii: sistematizaciya problem i napravlenij ih resheniya [Prospects to create “smart cities” in Russia: Classification of problems and their solutions]. Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta. Seria Ekonomika = Perm University Herald. Economy, 13(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.17072/1994-9960-2018-1-75-89

  • Vorobeva, O. V., Manzhula, E. A., & Yashina, A. V. (2019). Umnyi gorozhanin v umnom gorode: obzor podkhodov v Rossii i za rubezhom [Smart citizen in a smart city: review of Russian and international approaches]. International Journal of Open Information Technologies, 7(5), 59–65. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=38215106

  • Woetzel, J., & Kuznetsova, E. (2018). Tekhnologii umnykh gorodov: chto vliiaet na vybor gorozhan? [Smart city solutions: What drives citizen adoption around the globe?]. McKinsey Center for Government. http://www.energoatlas.ru/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Smart-city-solutions-What-drives-citizen-adoption-around-the-globe-RU-McCinsey.pdf

  • Yavo-Ayalon, S., Aharon-Gutman, M., & Alon-Mozes, T. (2019). A city for itself: A peripheral mixed city’s struggle for cultural capital. City & Community, 18(3), 792–811. https://doi.org/10.1111/cico.12431

How to Cite
Kostko, N., & Pecherkina, I. (2021). Urban Identities in Russian Cities and the Prospects of Their “Smart” Development. Changing Societies & Personalities, 5(4), 636–653. doi:10.15826/csp.2021.5.4.154