Decanonized Reading: Intellectual Humility and Mindfulness in Reading Canonical Philosophical Writings

  • Aireen Grace Tomagan Andal Ural Federal University, Yekaterinburg, Russia


A serious concern faced by many scholars and readers of philosophy is how to proceed after reading the canonical texts; this may include the question – “why are they canons, anyway?” Of course, developing a passing knowledge of the works of mainstream philosophers remains an inevitable burden for students of philosophy. However, any specific written work is a product of particular vantage points and contexts, and thus cannot escape from showing partiality towards some perspectives. This work revisits the taken-for-granted assumptions involved in the selection of canonical texts and argues for a critical readership and re-imagination of their canonical status and pre-eminence. The necessity of a de-canonized reading of canonical texts is asserted; that is, a repositioning of these texts vis-à-vis in relation to the wide availability of non-canonical philosophical works, which permits a nuanced account of their reading and interpretation. Here, the goal is to examine the potential of an approach that prompts readers of philosophical texts to navigate the richness of different contexts and perspectives without being dependent on the Western agenda as the central frame of inquiry. It is hoped that this mode of rethinking may, at the very least, promote epistemic modesty.


  • Aries, P. (1962). Centuries of Childhood: a Social History of Family Life. New York: Vintage.

  • Bäck, A. (1994). The Islamic Background: Avicenna (b. 980; d. 1037) and Averroes (b. 1126; d. 1198). In J. Gracia (Ed.) Individuation in Scholasticism: The Later Middle Ages and the Counter-Reformation 1150–1650, 39–67. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

  • Butler, J. (1993) Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex. New York: Routledge.

  • Busia, K. A. (1963). The African World-View. In J. Drachler (Ed.) African Heritage, 140–152. New York: Crowell Collier and Macmillan.

  • Chakrabarty, D. (2000). Provincializing Europe: Post-Colonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton University Press.

  • Connell, R. (1997). Why is Classical Theory Classical? American Journal of Sociology, 102 (6), 1511–1557.

  • Cox, R. (1981). Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10, 128–155.

  • Danto, A. (1995). The Decline and Fall of the Analytical Philosophy of History. In Frank Ankersmit & Hans Kellner (Eds.) A New Philosophy of History, 70–88. University of Chicago Press.

  • Duchesne, R. (2011). The Uniqueness of the West. Leiden: Brill.

  • Foucault, M. (1969). The Archeology of Knowledge. London/New York: Routledge.

  • Galison, P. (2008). Ten Problems of History and Philosophy of Science. Isis, 99 (1), 111–124. DOI: 10.1086/587536

  • Gillings, R. (1972). Mathematics in the Time of the Pharaohs. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Gress, D. (1998). From Plato to NATO: The Idea of the West and its Opponents. New York, NY: The Free Press.

  • Hadot, P. (2002). What is Ancient Philosophy? Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

  • Hallen, B. (2002). A Short History of African Philosophy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

  • Hallen, B., and Sodipo, J. O. (1997). Knowledge, Belief, and Witchcraft: Analytic Experiments in African Philosophy. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.

  • Jinadu, A.M. (2014). Rethinking the comparison between African and Western Philosophies. International Journal of Political Science and Development, 2 (8), 180–187. DOI: 10.14662/IJPSD2014.037

  • Leiter, B. (2013). Nietzsche against the Philosophical Canon. University of Chicago Public Law & Legal Theory Working Paper, No. 438. Retrieved from

  • Lyotard, J-F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: a Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

  • Marmura, M. E. (1975). Avicenna’s Chapter ‘On the Relative’ in the Metaphysics of the al-Shifã’. In G. F. Hourani (Ed.) Essays on Islamic Philosophy and Science, Studies in Islamic Philosophy and Science, 83–99. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

  • Olberding, A. (2004). The Consummation of Sorrow: An Analysis of Confucius’ Grief for Yan Hui. Philosophy East & West, 54 (3), 279–301.

  • Omotsho, I. F. (2014). A Critique of the Question of African Philosophy. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 19 (7), 61–66.

  • Park, P. K. J. (2013). Africa, Asia, and the Philosophy of History: Racism in the Formation of the Philosophical Canon, 1780–1830. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

  • Ryan, J., and Louie, K. (2007). False Dichotomy? ‘Western’ and ‘Confucian’ concepts of scholarship and learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 39, 404–417. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00347.x

  • Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. New York: Penguin Books.

  • Strauss, L. (1952). Persecution and the Art of Writing. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

  • Tan, S.-H. (2004). From Cannibalism to Empowerment: An Analects-Inspired Attempt to Balance Community and Liberty. Philosophy East and West, 54 (1), 52–70.

  • Uduigwomen, A. F. (1995). Philosophy and the Place of African Philosophy. In A. F. Uduigwomen (Ed.) Footmarks on African Philosophy, 3–9. Lagos: Obaroh & Ogbinaka Publishers.

  • Wang, R. (2005). Dong Zhongshu’s Transformation of ‘Yin-Yang’ Theoryand Contesting of Gender Identity. Philosophy East and West, 55 (2), 209–231.

  • Yuan, J. (2006). The Role of Time in the Structure of Chinese Logic. Philosophy East and West, 56 (1), 136–152.

  • Žižek, S. (1996) “I hear you through my eyes”: or, the invisible master. In R. Salecl & S. Žižek (Eds.) Gaze and Voice as Love Objects, 90–126. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

How to Cite
Andal, A. (2018). Decanonized Reading: Intellectual Humility and Mindfulness in Reading Canonical Philosophical Writings. Changing Societies & Personalities, 2(1), 56-74. doi:10.15826/csp.2018.2.1.030