A General Attitude towards Shopping and Its Link with Basic Human Values in the UK


Prior literature about shopping has focused mostly on specific aspects such as on attitudes towards specific products or shopping practices. A General Shopping Attitude (GSA), capturing how much an individual is attracted by shopping in general, has rarely been explored. In an online questionnaire study conducted in the UK, here we developed and validated a self-report scale to assess GSA. Moreover, adopting Schwartz’s theory of basic human values as framework, we explored the relationship between GSA and general value orientations. We observed that people valuing more Self-enhancement versus Self-transcendence (i.e., valuing the own social status and wellbeing versus the wellbeing of others and of the environment) reported more positive GSA. This fits with theories proposing that, in consumer societies, shopping is appealing because it allows one to achieve social status. Contrary to perspectives claiming that shopping is appealing because it enables expressing creativity and freedom, a negative relation between GSA and Self-direction (i.e., a tendency to value freedom and creativity) emerged. Rather, this observation fits with proposals viewing the appeal of shopping in its ability to enable one to conform to a reference group’s standards. These findings shed light on general value orientations underlying the appeal of shopping.

Author Biography

Francesco Rigoli, City, University of London, United Kingdom

Francesco Rigoli, PhD, is a senior lecturer at the Department of Psychology at City, University of London (UK). His current research focuses on applying cognitive psychology research to explore topics in cultural psychology, such as ideology, religion, and ethics.


  • Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M. (1994). Work and/or fun: measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4), 644–656. https://doi.org/10.1086/209376

  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press. (Originally published in French 1979)

  • Campbell, C. (1987). The romantic ethic and the spirit of modern consumerism. Blackwell.

  • Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 284–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284

  • Dolnicar, S., Grün, B., & Leisch, F. (2018). Market segmentation analysis: Understanding it, doing it, and making it useful. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8818-6

  • Douglas, M., & Isherwood, B. (2021). The world of goods. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003133650

  • Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.

  • Featherstone, M. (2007). Consumer culture and postmodernism (2nd ed.). Sage.

  • Guido, G. (2006). Shopping motives, big five factors, and the hedonic/utilitarian shopping value: An integration and factorial study. Innovative Marketing, 2(2), 57–67. https://www.businessperspectives.org/images/pdf/applications/publishing/templates/article/assets/1714/im_en_2006_02_Guido.pdf

  • Hirsch, F. (1976). Social limits to growth. Harvard University Press.

  • Holt, D. B. (2004). How brands become icons: The principles of cultural branding. Harvard Business School Press.

  • Kasser, T., & Kanner, A. D. (Eds.). (2004). Psychology and consumer culture: The struggle for a good life in a materialistic world. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10658-000

  • McDonald, M. (2012). Market segmentation: How to do it and how to profit from it (4th ed.). Wiley.

  • Milestone, K., & Meyer, A. (2012). Gender and popular culture. Polity Press.

  • Miller, D. (1998). A theory of shopping. Cornell University Press.

  • Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). Tata McGraw-Hill.

  • Riesman, D. (1961). The lonely crowd: A study of the changing American character. Yale University Press. (Originally published 1950)

  • Rigoli, F. (2021). The link between COVID-19, anxiety, and religious beliefs in the United States and the United Kingdom. Journal of Religion and Health, 60, 2196–2208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-021-01296-5

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6

  • Simmel, G. (1900). Philosophie des Geldes [The philosophy of money]. Duncker & Humblot.

  • Slater, D. (1997). Consumer culture and modernity. Polity Press.

  • Solberg, E. G., Diener, E., & Robinson, M. D. (2004). Why are materialists less satisfied? In T. Kasser & A. D. Kanner (Eds.), Psychology and consumer culture: The struggle for a good life in a materialistic world (pp. 29–48). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10658-003

  • Stillerman, J. (2015). The sociology of consumption: A global approach. Wiley.

  • Tauber, E. M. (1972). Marketing notes and communications: Why do people shop? Journal of Marketing, 36(4), 46–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224297203600409

  • Veblen, T. (2005). The theory of the leisure class: An economic study of institutions. Aakar Books. (Originally published 1899)

  • Wassel, J. I. (2011). Business and aging: The boomer effect on consumers and marketing. In R. A. Settersten & J. L. Angel (Eds.), Handbook of sociology of aging (pp. 351–359). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7374-0_22

  • Zelizer, V. A. (1989). The social meaning of money: “special monies”. American Journal of Sociology, 95(2), 342–377. https://doi.org/10.1086/229272

How to Cite
Rigoli, F. (2021). A General Attitude towards Shopping and Its Link with Basic Human Values in the UK. Changing Societies & Personalities, 5(4), 618–635. doi:10.15826/csp.2021.5.4.153