Ordoliberalism Revisited

  • Thomas F. Remington Emory University and Harvard University, United States


The recent publication of Kenneth Dyson’s book Conservative Liberalism, Liberalism, Ordo-Liberalism, and the State offers an occasion to reconsider the body of ideas known as ordoliberalism. The books reviewed here represent much of the most recent scholarship in English on the subject. In this essay, I undertake two tasks: first, to clarify what the term properly refers to and in particular how it is related to “neoliberalism,” and, second, to consider its influence on postwar German policies and institutions. I argue that much of the recent discussion of ordoliberalism and neoliberalism overlooks important differences between early ordoliberal thinking and the ideas associated with neoliberalism. Over time, as neoliberalism evolved and particularly as it became an ideological justification for policies and institutions justifying the accumulation of concentrated market power, these differences have become wider even as they have been obscured by misreadings of ordoliberalism. A better understanding of ordoliberalism can also provide insights relevant to the contemporary debates about the crisis of liberal democracy and capitalism. Is it in fact a “third way” for ordering an economy, an alternative to neoliberalism and socialism?

Author Biography

Thomas F. Remington, Emory University and Harvard University, United States

Thomas F. Remington is Goodrich C. White Professor Emeritus of Political Science at the Emory University. He studies the development of political institutions in transitional states. Dr. Remington is the author of numerous books and articles on Russian politics, including The Politics of Inequality in Russia (Cambridge, 2011). His current research addresses the formation of social policy in Russia and China.

He was the Chair of the Political Science Department at the Emory from 2001–2007. He has been a member of the Boards of Directors of the National Council for Eurasian and East European Research and the American Association for the Advancement of Slavic Studies.


  • Abelshauser, W. (2004). Deutsche Wirtschaftsgeschichte: von 1945 bis zur Gegenwart [German economic history: from 1945 to the present]. C. H. Beck.

  • Akman, P. (2012). The concept of abuse in EU competition law: Law and economic approaches. Hart.

  • Aslund, A. (2019). Russia’s crony capitalism: The path from market economy to kleptocracy. Yale University Press.

  • Blyth, M. (2013). Austerity: The history of a dangerous idea. Oxford University Press.

  • Böhm, F. (1933). Wettbewerb und Monopolkampf: Eine Untersuchung zur Frage des wirtschaftlichen Kampfrechts und zur Frage der rechtlichen Struktur der geltenden Wirtschaftsordnung [Competition and monopoly struggle: An inquiry into the question of the economic right to struggle and the question of the legal structure of the current economic order]. Carl Heymanns.

  • Böhm, F. (1960). Das Problem der privaten Macht: ein Beitrag zur Monopolfrage [The problem of private power: a contribution to the monopoly question]. In F. Böhm, Reden und Schriften: über die Ordnung einer freien Gesellschaft, einer freien Wirtschaft und über die Wiedergutmachung (pp. 25–45). C. F. Müller. (Originally published in Die Justiz, Vol. III, 1928, pp. 324–345)

  • Böhm, F., Eucken, W., & Großmann-Doerth. H. (1937). Unsere Aufgabe [Our Task]. In F. Böhm (Ed.), Die Ordnung der Wirtschaft als geschichtliche Aufgabe und rechtsschöpferische Leistung (pp. VII–XXI). W. Kohlhammer.

  • Böhm, F., Eucken, W., & Großmann-Doerth, H. (1989). The Ordo Manifesto of 1936. In A. T. Peacock & H. Willgerodt (Eds.), Germany’s social market economy: Origins and evolition (pp. 15–26). Palgrave Macmillan. (Originally published in German as "Unsere Aufgabe" [Our task] in F. Böhm, 1937, pp. VII-XXI). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20145-7_2

  • Boycko, M., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1995). Privatizing Russia. MIT Press.

  • Brandeis, L. D. (1913). Competition. American Legal News, 44, 5–14.

  • Broadman, H. G. (2000). Reducing structural dominance and entry barriers in Russian industry. Review of Industrial Organization, 17(2), 155–175. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007809813284

  • Crane, D. (2013). Ordoliberalism and the Freiburg school. In D. A. Crane & H. Hovenkamp (Eds.), The making of competition policy: Legal and economic source (pp. 252–281). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199782796.003.0008

  • Dahl, R. A. (1961). Who governs? Democracy and power in an American City. Yale University Press.

  • Dahl, R. A. (1982). Dilemmas of pluralist democracy: autonomy vs. control. Yale University Press.

  • Dawisha, K. (2014). Putin’s kleptocracy: Who owns Russia? Simon & Schuster.

  • Dyson, K. (2021). Conservative liberalism, liberalism, Ordo-liberalism, and the state. Oxford University Press.

  • Erhard, E. (2020). Wohlstand für Alle [Prosperity for all]. Econ.

  • Eucken, W. (1938). Nationalökonomie—wozu? [National economy—what for?] Felix Meiner.

  • Eucken, W. (1947). Die Grundlagen der Nationalökonomie [The foundations of national economics]. Küpper.

  • Eucken, W. (1951). This unsuccessful age: Or, the pains of economic progress. W. Hodge.

  • Eucken, W. (2004). Grundsätze der Wirtschaftspolitik [Principles of economic policy] (7th ed.). Mohr Siebeck.

  • Fear, J. (2006). Cartels and competition: Neither markets nor hierarchies (Working paper, 07-011). Harvard Business School. https://www.hbs.edu/ris/Publication%20Files/07-011.pdf

  • Föste, W. (2006). Grundwerte in der Ordnungskonzeption der Sozialen Marktwirtschaft [Basic values in the regulatory concept of the social market economy]. Metropolis.

  • Gerber, D. J. (2001). Law and competition in twentieth century Europe: Protecting Prometheus. Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199244010.001.0001

  • Haley, J. O. (2001). Antitrust in Germany and Japan: The first fifty years, 1947–1998. University of Washington Press.

  • Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–296.

  • Heidorn, H., & Weche, J. P. (2021). Business concentration data for Germany. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, 241(5–6), 801–811. https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-2020-0010

  • Hellman, J. (1998). Winners take all: The politics of partial reform in postcommunist transitions. World Politics, 50(2), 203–234. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100008091

  • Hien, J., & Joerges, C. (Eds.). (2017). Ordoliberalism, law and the rule of economics. Hart.

  • Johnson, S., & Kroll, H. (1991). Managerial strategies for spontaneous privatization. Soviet Economy, 7(4), 281–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/08826994.1991.10641340

  • Joskow, P. L., Schmalensee, R., & Tsukanova, N. (1994). Competition policy in Russia during and after privatization. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics, 301–374.

  • Katzenstein, P. J. (1987). Policy and politics in West Germany: The growth of a semisovereign state. Temple University Press.

  • Kroll, H. (1991). Monopoly and transition to the market. Soviet Economy, 7(2), 143–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/08826994.1991.10641334

  • Leitzel, J. (1994). A note on monopoly and Russian economic reform. Communist Economies and Economic Transformation, 6(1), 45–53.

  • MacLean, N. (2017). Democracy in chains: The deep history of the radical right’s stealth plan for America. Penguin Books.

  • Mirowski, P., & Plehwe, D. (Eds.). (2015). The road from Mont Pèlerin: The making of the neoliberal thought collective. Harvard University Press.

  • Monopolkommission. (2018). Hauptgutachten XXII, Wettbewerb 2018 [Main report XXII, Competition 2018]. Nomos. https://www.monopolkommission.de/de/gutachten/hauptgutachten/212-xxii-gesamt.html

  • Müller-Armack, A. (1982). The social aspect of the economic system. In W. Stützel, C. Watrin, H. Willgerodt, & K. Hohmann (Eds.), Standard texts on the social market economy: Two centuries of discussion (D. Rutter, Trans., pp. 9–22). Gustav Fischer. (Originally published in German 1947)

  • Murach-Brand, L. (2004). Antitrust auf deutsch: Der Einfluß der amerikanischen Aliierten auf das Gesetz gegen Wettbewerbsbeschränkungen (GWB) nach 1945 [Antitrust in German: The influence of the American allies on the Act against restraints of competition (GWB) after 1945]. Mohr Siebeck.

  • Nicholls, A. J. (1994). Freedom with responsibility: The social market economy in Germany, 1918–1963. Clarendon Press.

  • Peacock, A., & Willgerodt, H. (Eds.). (1989). Germany’s social market economy: Origins and evolution. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20145-7

  • Quack, S., & Djelic, M.-L. (2005). Adaptation, recombination, and reinforcement: The story of antitrust and competition law in Germany and Europe. In W. Streeck & K. Thelen (Eds.), Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies (pp. 255–281). Oxford University Press.

  • Remington, Th. F. (2018). Public–private partnerships in TVET: adapting the dual system in the United States. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 70(4), 497–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2018.1450776

  • Schweitzer, A. (1964). Big business in the Third Reich. Indiana University Press.

  • Simons, H. (1934). A positive program for laissez faire: Some proposals for a liberal economic policy (Public policy pamphlet No. 15). University of Chicago Press. https://desmarais-tremblay.com/Resources/Simons%20Henry%20C.%201934%20A%20Positive%20Program%20for%20Laissez%20Faire.pdf

  • Slobodian, Q. (2018). Globalists: The end of empire and the birth of neoliberalism. Harvard University Press.

  • Streeck. W. (1984). Industrial relations in West Germany: A case study of the car industry. Heinemann.

  • Streeck, W. (1997). German capitalism: Does it exist? Can it survive? New Political Economy, 2(2), 237–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563469708406299

  • Streeck, W. (2010). Re-forming capitalism: Institutional change in the German political economy. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573981.001.0001

  • Streeck, W., & Hassel, A. (2004). The crumbling pillars of social partnership. In H. Kitschelt & W. Streeck (Eds.), Germany: Beyond the stable state (pp. 95–117). Frank Cass.

  • Thelen, K. (2014). Varieties of liberalization and the new politics of social solidarity. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107282001

  • Treisman, D. (2007). Putin’s silovarchs. Orbis, 51(1), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orbis.2006.10.013

  • Vail, M. I. (2018). Liberalism in illiberal states: Ideas and economic adjustment in contemporary Europe. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190683986.001.0001

  • Wambach, A., & Weche, J. (2018). Hat Deutschland ein Marktmachtproblem? [Does Germany have a market power problem?] Wirtschaftdienst, 98(11), 791–798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10273-018-2368-6

  • Webb, S., & Webb, B. (1936). Soviet communism: A new civilization (Vols. 1–2). Longmans, Green.

How to Cite
Remington, T. (2022). Ordoliberalism Revisited. Changing Societies & Personalities, 6(1), 10–34. doi:10.15826/csp.2022.6.1.161