Digital Fears Experienced by Young People in the Age of Technoscience


With the advance of technoscience, digital technologies have started to reshape the traditional array of social fears experienced by younger generations by triggering the appearance of new, digital fears. In this article, we undertake a sociological analysis to investigate the concept of digital fears both theoretically and empirically. Our survey conducted among Russian young people aged 18–30 in 2020 (N = 1050, Sverdlovsk region, Russian Federation) showed that fear is a distinctive characteristic of the social well-being of this generation. Moreover, fear tends to become more pronounced both quantitatively (i.e., the frequency of emergence) and qualitatively (i.e. the emergence of new types). The identified digital fears of young people allowed us to draw their typology. Depending on the specifics of digital threat, the following types were distinguished: those associated with impact and control, crime and security, communication and activity, technology and innovation, and social inequality. We show that the expanding range of social fears leads to the formation of catastrophic thinking in young people, thereby affecting the level of social well-being and distorting the image of the future.

Author Biographies

Sofya B. Abramova, Ural Federal University, Yekaterinburg, Russia

Sofya B. Abramova, Cand. Sci. (Sociology), Associate Professor, Department of Applied Sociology, Ural Federal University. Her major interests center around sociolinguistics, modern technologies of studying public opinion, sociology of the media, and sociology of youth. During her research career, Sofya has published over 100 research articles. Among her most recent foci of interest are the institute of higher education during digitalization, as well as social practices of urban populations.

Natalya L. Antonova, Ural Federal University, Yekaterinburg, Russia

Natalya L. Antonova, Dr. Sci. (Sociology), Professor, Department of Applied Sociology, Ural Federal University. Her research interests focus on the theory and methodology of sociological research, sociology of social changes, urban studies, study of the human body, modern educational technologies, and modern global processes. Natalya is the author of over 250 articles in the field of social studies. Her most recent research focus is social transformations of the urban space and social practices of the urban youth.

Riccardo Campa, Institute of Sociology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland

Riccardo Campa is Extraordinary Professor of Sociology and Director of the History of Ideas Research Centre at Jagiellonian University in Krakow. He teaches Social and Political Philosophy, and Futures Analysis. He possesses two Master of Arts degrees, in Political Science and Philosophy, from the University of Bologna, a PhD degree in Epistemology from the Nicholas Copernicus University in Torun, Poland, and a doctoral habilitation in Sociology from the Jagiellonian University in Krakow, Poland. Prior to becoming an academic, Campa had been a police lieutenant with Guardia di Finanza and a journalist for La Voce di Mantova and the newsmagazine Il Mondo. He founded and is currently the Honorary President of the Italian Transhumanist Association, served as the Director of the World Transhumanist Association (2006–2008), and is a Fellow of the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies. Most of his publications relate to the social study of science and technology.

Natalia G. Popova, Institute for Philosophy and Law, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Yekaterinburg, Russia

Natalia G. Popova, Cand. Sci. (Sociology), Senior Researcher, Institute for Philosophy and Law of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Natalia has been conducting research into various aspects of academic communication for over 25 years. She holds Master’s degree in engineering, linguistics, and sociology. Currently, her research interests center around sociology of science and technology, in particular, the problems of open access and digitalization, transformation in the role of scientific journals in academic communication, academic publishing under the influence of globalization trends. Along with sociological research, she continues to improve approaches to teaching academic English to postgraduate students both in publishing methodological and scientific materials, running webinars and seminars. Her most recent focus of interest is linguistic translation of scientific texts and their preparation for publication in international scholarly journals.


  • Alam, N., Gurpreet, D., & Tiago, O. (2021). Psychological antecedents and consequences of online romance scam victimization fear. In Proceedings of AMCIS 2021 “Digital Innovation and Entrepreneurship”, August 9–13, 2021 (Social Computing, Article 11).

  • Alfano, C. A., & Beidel, D. C. (Eds.). (2011). Social anxiety in adolescents and young adults: Translating developmental science into practice. American Psychological Association.

  • Alonso, J., Liu, Z., Evans-Lacko, S., Sadikova, E., Sampson, N., Chatterji, S., Abdulmalik, J., Aguilar-Gaxiola, S., Al-Hamzawi, A., Andrade, L. H., Bruffaerts, R., Cardoso, G., Cia, A., Florescu, S., de Girolamo, G., Gureje, O., Haro, J. M., He, Y., de Jonge, P., . . . Thornicroft, G. (2018). Treatment gap for anxiety disorders is global: Results of the World Mental Health Surveys in 21 countries. Depress Anxiety, 35(3), 195–208.

  • Altuwairiqi, M., Jiang, N., & Ali, R. (2019). Problematic attachment to social media: five behavioural archetypes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(12), 2136.

  • Alutaybi, A., Al-Thani, D., McAlaney, J., & Ali, R. (2020). Combating fear of missing out (FoMO) on social media: the FoMO-R method. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(17), 6128.

  • Antonova, N., Abramova, S., & Popova, N. (2021). Online education in the estimates of Russian university students: prior to and during the pandemic. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference “Efficiency and Responsibility in Education 2021”, Prague, Czech Republic, June 3–4, 2021 (pp. 3–12). Czech University of Life Sciences Prague.

  • Bantinaki, K. (2012). The paradox of horror: fear as a positive emotion. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 70(4), 383–392.

  • Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation. The University of Michigan Press. (Originally published in French 1981)

  • Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Polity Press.

  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: towards a new modernity (M. Ritter, Trans.). Sage. (Originally published in German 1986)

  • Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. Anchor Books.

  • Bloemen, N., & De Coninck, D. (2020). Social media and fear of missing out in adolescents: the role of family characteristics. Social Media + Society, 6(4).

  • Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford University Press.

  • Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. W. W. Norton & Company.

  • Campa, R. (2015). Humans and automata. A social study of robotics. Peter Lang.

  • Campa, R. (2019). Three scenarios of the future of work. Technological unemployment, compensation, hollowing out. Sociology and Technoscience, 9(2), 140–154.

  • Campa, R. (2020). Fourth industrial revolution and emotional intelligence: A conceptual and scientometric analysis. Changing Societies & Personalities, 4(1), 8–30.

  • Carleton, R. N. (2016). Fear of the unknown: One fear to rule them all? Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 41, 5–21.

  • Cham, S., Algashami, A., Aldhayan, M., McAlaney, J., Phalp, K., Almourad, M.B., & Ali, R. (2019). Digital addiction: Negative life experiences and potential for technology-assisted solutions. In Á. Rocha, H. Adeli, L. Reis, & S. Costanzo (Eds.), New knowledge in information systems and technologies. WorldCIST'19 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 931, pp. 921–931).

  • Chipizatsiia: (ne)prizrachnaia ugroza? [Chipization: (not) a phantom threat?]. (2020, August 26). Vserossiiskii tsentr izucheniia obshchestvennogo mneniia (VTsIOM).

  • Delgado, A. (Ed.). (2016). Technoscience and citizenship: ethics and governance in the digital society. Springer.

  • Deniz, M. (2021). Fear of missing out (FoMO) mediate relations between social self-efficacy and life satisfaction. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 34, Article 28.

  • Elhai, J. D., Yang, H., & Montag, C. (2020). Fear of missing out (FOMO): overview, theoretical underpinnings, and literature review on relations with severity of negative affectivity and problematic technology use. Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry, 43(2), 203–209.

  • Ford, M. (2015). Rise of the robots: technology and the threat of a jobless future. Basic Books.

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison [A. Sheridan, Trans.]. Penguin Books. (Originally published in French 1975)

  • Franchina, V., Vanden Abeele, M., van Rooij, A. J., Lo Coco, G., & De Marez, L. (2018). Fear of missing out as a predictor of problematic social media use and phubbing behavior among Flemish adolescents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(10), 2319.

  • Frase, P. (2016). Four futures: Life after capitalism. Verso.

  • Furedi, F. (1997). Culture of fear: Risk-taking and the morality of low expectation. Cassell.

  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford University Press.

  • Glassner, В. (1999). The culture of fear: Why Americans are afraid of the wrong things. Basic Books.

  • Global Agenda Council on the Future of Software & Society. (2015, September). Deep shift-technology tipping points and societal impact (Survey report). World Economic Forum.

  • González-López, Ó. R., Buenadicha-Mateos, M., & Sánchez-Hernández, M. I. (2021) Overwhelmed by technostress? Sensitive archetypes and effects in times of forced digitalization. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(8), 4216.

  • Hayran, C., & Anik, L. (2021). Well-being and fear of missing out (FOMO) on digital content in the time of COVID-19: a correlational analysis among university students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(4), 1974.

  • Heinrichs, N., Rapee, R. M., Alden, L. A., Bögels, S., Hofmann, S. G., Oh, K. J., & Sakano, Y. (2006). Cultural differences in perceived social norms and social anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44(8), 1187–1197.

  • Hofmann, S. G., Anu Asnaani, A., & Hinton, D. E. (2010). Cultural aspects in social anxiety and social anxiety disorder. Depression and Anxiety, 27(12), 1117–1127.

  • Hur, J., DeYoung, K. A., Islam, S., Anderson, A. S., Barstead, M. G., & Shackman, A. J. (2020). Social context and the real-world consequences of social anxiety. Psychological Medicine, 50(12), 1989–2000.

  • Informatsionnoe obshchestvo v Rossiiskoi Federatsii. 2020: statisticheskii sbornik [Information society in the Russian Federation. 2020: statistical digest]. (2020). Federal State Statistics Service of the Russian Federation and Higher School of Economics.

  • Jefferies, P., & Ungar, M. (2020). Social anxiety in young people: A prevalence study in seven countries. PLoS One, 15(9), e0239133.

  • Jiang, Y. (2021). Problematic social media usage and anxiety among university students during the COVID-19 pandemic: the mediating role of psychological capital and the moderating role of academic burnout. Frontiers of Psychology, 12, Article 612007.

  • Johnson, N. R. (1985). Panic and the breakdown of social order: popular myth, social theory and empirical evidence. Sociological Focus, 20(3), 171–183.

  • Karta strakhov rossiian: osen'-2019 [Map of fears of Russians: autumn-2019]. (2019, November 12). Vserossiiskii tsentr izucheniia obshchestvennogo mneniia (VTsIOM).

  • Kastenhofer, K., & Schwarz, A. (2011). Probing technoscience. Poiesis & Praxis: International Journal of Ethics of Science and Technology Assessment, 8(2–3), 61–65.

  • Kępiński, A. (1977). Lęk [Anxiety]. Państwowy Zakład Wydawnictw Lekarskich.

  • Keshet, Y. (2020). Fear of panoptic surveillance: using digital technology to control the COVID-19 epidemic. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research, 9, Article 67.

  • Keynes, J. M. (2010). Economic possibilities for our grandchildren. In Essays in Persuasion (pp. 321–332). Palgrave Macmillan. (Originally published 1930)

  • Khodykin, M. (2020, May 28). Seichas liudi plokho ponimaiut, chto i kak budet zavtra [Now people do not understand well what and how it will be tomorrow]. Izvestia.

  • Kirziuk, A. A. (2021). “U menia net strakha”: kovid-dissidenty v poiskakh agentnosti i pravdy [“I have no fear”: COVID skeptics in search of agency and truth]. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 2, 484–509.

  • Luhmann, N. (1991). Soziologie des risikos [Sociology of risk]. Walter de Gruyter.

  • Lupia, A., & Menning, J. O. (2009). When can politicians scare citizens into supporting bad policies? American Journal of Political Science, 53(1), 90–106.

  • Lyotard, J-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge (G. Bennington & B. Massumi, Trans.). Manchester University Press. (Originally published in French 1979)

  • Mason, O. J., Stevenson, C., & Freedman, F. (2014). Ever-present threats from information technology: the Cyber-Paranoia and Fear Scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 1298.

  • Mohler-Kuo, M., Dzemaili, S., Foster, S., Werlen, L., & Walitza, S. (2021). Stress and mental health among children/adolescents, their parents, and young adults during the first COVID-19 lockdown in Switzerland. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(9), 4668.

  • Ogburn, W. F. (1922). Social change: with respect to culture and original nature. Huebsch.

  • Pawluczuk, A. (2020). Digital youth inclusion and the big data divide: examining the Scottish perspective. Internet Policy Review, 9(2).

  • Polovine rossiian predrekli poteriu raboty iz-za robotov [Half of Russians were predicted to lose their jobs due to robots]. (2018, March 29).

  • Popova, N., Moiseenko, Y., & Beavitt, T. (2017). Conformity in modern science: An engine of societal transformation? Changing Societies & Personalities, 1(3), 237–258.

  • Przhilenskiy, V. I. (2021). Poniatie tsifrovoi real'nosti: znachenie i smysl [The concept of digital reality: meaning and significance]. Philosophy of Science and Technology, 26(2), 68–80.

  • Reichle, I. (2009). Art in the age of technoscience: genetic engineering, robotics, and artificial life in contemporary art. Springer.

  • Satawedin, P. (2020). Moral panics and COVID-19: Are we panic ourselves or do media make us panic? BU Academic Review, 19(2), 207–224.

  • Shliapentokh, V. E., Shubkin, V. N., & Iadov, V. A. (Eds.). (1999). Katastroficheskoe soznanie v sovremennom mire v kontse XX veka (po materialam mezhdunarodnykh issledovanii) [Catastrophic consciousness in the modern world at the end of the 20th century (based on materials from international studies)]. Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (ISRAS).

  • Sik, D. (2020). Towards a social theory of fear: a phenomenology of negative integration. European Journal of Social Theory, 23(4), 512–531.

  • Slobounov, S. (2008). Injuries in athletics: causes and consequences. Springer.

  • Sorokin, P. A. (1954). The ways and power of love: types, factors, and techniques of moral transformation. Beacon Press.

  • Stupp, C. (2019, August 30). Fraudsters used AI to mimic CEO’s voice in unusual cybercrime case. The Wall Street Journal.

  • Sushpanova, I. S. (2018). “Postpravda” v sotsial'noi real'nosti: riski i ugrozy [“Post-truth” in social reality: risks and threats]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies], 12, 94–104.

  • Teh, C. (2021, December 23). A Swedish company has created a microchip that allows users to carry their COVID vaccine passport under their skin. Insider.

  • Terpstra, T. (2011). Emotions, trust, and perceived risk: affective and cognitive routes to flood preparedness behavior. Risk Analysis, 31(10), 1658–1675.

  • Tesar, M. (2020). Towards a post-Covid-19 “new normality”: physical and social distancing, the move to online and higher education. Policy Futures in Education, 18(5), 556–559.

  • Third, A., Collin, P., Walsh, L., & Black, R. (2019). Young people in digital society: control shift. Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Till, C. (2021). Propaganda through “reflexive control” and the mediated construction of reality. New Media & Society, 23(6), 1362–1378.

  • Trevogi i opaseniia: povsednevnaia zhizn', strana, mir [Anxieties and fears: everyday life, country, world]. (2019, April 16). Fond Obshchestvennoe Mnenie.

  • Tudor, A. (2003). A (macro) sociology of fear? The Sociological Review, 51(2), 238–256.

  • Ungar, S. (2001). Moral panic versus the risk society: the implications of the changing sites of social anxiety. British Journal of Sociology, 52(2), 271–291.

  • Uskova, A., & Astrakhantsev, V. (2020, February 11). Iskusstvennyi intellekt dlia rossiian: riski ili vozmozhnosti? [Artificial intelligence for Russians: Risks or opportunities?]. ECM-Journal.

  • Vartanova, E. L., & Gladkova, A. A. (2021). Tsifrovoe neravenstvo, tsifrovoi kapital, tsifrovaia vkliuchennost': dinamika teoreticheskikh podkhodov i politicheskikh reshenii [Digital divide, digital capital, digital inclusion: dynamics of theoretical approaches and political decisions]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 10. Zhurnalistika, 1, 3–29.

  • Veraksa, A. N., Kornienko, D. S., Chichinina, E. A., Bukhalenkova, D. A., & Chursina A. V. (2021). Correlations between preschoolers’ screen time with gender, age and socio-economic background of the families. The Art and Science of Television, 17(3), 179–209.

  • Walsh, J. (2002). Shyness and social phobia: a social work perspective on a problem in living. Health & Social Work, 27(2), 137–144.

  • Watson, R. (1995). Angoisse dans la 42e rue [Anxiety on 42nd street] (V.-L. Bernard & P. Paperman, Trans.). In P. Paperman & R. Ogien (Eds.), La couleur des pensées. Sentiments, émotions, intentions (pp. 197–216). EHESS.

  • Yli-Länttä, H. (2020). Young people’s experiences of social fears. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 25(1), 1022–1035.

  • Zemtsov, S. (2017). Roboty i potentsial'naia tekhnologicheskaia bezrabotitsav regionakh Rossii: opyt izucheniia i predvaritel'nye otsenki [Robots and potential technological unemployment in the Russian regions: Review and preliminary results]. Voprosy Ekonomiki, 7, 142–157.

  • Zueva, O. S. (2013). Sotsiostrukturnyi analiz sotsial'nykh strakhov naemnykh rabotnikov v regional'nom soobshchestve [Sociostructural analysis of social fears of employees in the regional community] [Ph.D. dissertation]. North-Caucasus Federal University.

How to Cite
Abramova, S., Antonova, N., Campa, R., & Popova, N. (2022). Digital Fears Experienced by Young People in the Age of Technoscience. Changing Societies & Personalities, 6(1), 56–78. doi:10.15826/csp.2022.6.1.163