Tyumen Embankment: Urban Hubris as a Trigger for the Transformation of Urban Identity


The article discusses the problem of place affecting urban identity formation. The granite-lined embankment of the Tura River becomes a factor in reassembling urban identity and forming new urban sensuousness for the residents of Tyumen. The identity of Tyumen has long oscillated between the provinciality of the “village capital” and the nomadism of the “hub city”, serving as a transit point to service the oil and gas industry. Nowadays, city residents perceive the embankment not only as a sign of Tyumen’s integration into a modern urban context, but also as a metaphor for the escape from the boggy swamp of uncertainty to the terra firma of solid granite. The technological characteristics of the four-tier embankment (its height and length) mark it as an outstanding engineering structure. The visual excessiveness of the embankment, framing the banks of a small river, makes it a source of pride for the citizens. To clarify the process of urban identity formation, the authors introduce the term “urban hubris”. There are multiple connotations of the hubris concept, ranging from “pride” to “transgression of one’s own destiny”. In this article, urban hubris refers not only to specific traits of people initiating megaprojects but to transgressive change in urban identity. This change can be triggered by fundamentally new strategies in city design or, as in this case, by a large-scale urban development project, conveying new city images, creating new public spaces, changing citizens’ daily practices, and, ultimately, transforming their urban identity.

Author Biographies

Vladimir G. Bogomyakov, University of Tyumen, Tyumen, Russia

Vladimir G. Bogomyakov is Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, Department of History and World Politics at the Institute of Social Sciences and Humanities, Tyumen State University. He is the author of about 50 articles, book chapters, and books. His main research interests are contemporary art, urban studies, modern social practices, identity issues. His latest research project is dedicated to the creative practices of Tyumen and the study of urban identity.

Marina G. Chistyakova, University of Tyumen, Tyumen, Russia

Marina G. Chistyakova is Doctor of Philosophy, Professor, Department of Philosophy at the Institute of Social Sciences and Humanities, Tyumen State University. She is the author of more than 50  articles, book chapters, and books. Her main research interests are contemporary art; art in an urban environment. Her latest research project is dedicated to the creative practices of Tyumen and the study of urban identity.


  • Anguelovski, I. (2014). Neighborhood as refuge: Community reconstruction, place remaking, and environmental justice in the city. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262026925.001.0001

  • Blackshaw, T. (2010). Key concepts in community studies. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446279076

  • Bleecker, S. E. (1981). The politics of architecture: A perspective on Nelson A. Rockefeller. Routledge.

  • Cheshire, P. C. (2006). Resurgent cities, urban myths and policy hubris: What we need to know. Urban Studies, 43(8), 1231–1246. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980600775600

  • Gehl, J. (2010). Cities for people. Island Press.

  • Golts, G. (1936, July 9). Arkhitektura naberezhnykh [The Architecture of embankments]. Arkhitekturnaya Gazeta. http://theory.totalarch.com/node/105

  • Gut, V., & Gaisina, D. (2016, July–August). Kod Tiumeni [Tyumen Code]. tmn, 2(29), 10–12. http://1tmn.ru/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/tmn_29_2016-2_razvorotno.pdf

  • Halpenny, E. A. (2010). Pro-environmental behaviours and park visitors: The effect of place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.04.006

  • Hauge, A. L. (2007). Identity and place: A critical comparison of three identity theories. Architectural Science Review, 50(1), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.3763/asre.2007.5007

  • Hull, R. B., Lam, M., & Vigo, G. (1994). Place-identity: Symbols of self in the urban fabric. Landscape and Urban Planning, 28(2–3), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(94)90001-9

  • Hume, D. (1998). Traktat o chelovecheskoi prirode: O poznanii. Ob affektakh. O morali [A treatise of human nature: Being an attempt to introduce the experimental method of reasoning into moral subjects] (S. I. Tsereteli, Trans.). Popurri. (Originally published in English 1739–1740)

  • Kaymaz, I. (2013). Urban landscapes and identity. In M. Özyavuz (Ed.), Advances in landscape architecture (pp. 739–760). InTech Open. https://doi.org/10.5772/55754

  • Koolhaas, R. (1978). Delirious New York: A retroactive manifesto for Manhattan. Oxford University Press.

  • Kolhaas, R. (1995). Bigness, or the problem of Large. In J. Sigler (Ed.), S, M, L, XL: Small, Medium, Large, Extra Large. The Monacelli Press.

  • Kyle, G., & Chick, G. (2007). The social construction of a sense of place. Leisure Sciences, 29(3), 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400701257922

  • Leontyeva, T. V., & Mokienko, V. M. (2021). Metafora bolota v kharakteristikakh sotsiuma [The SWAMP metaphor in characteristics of society]. Tomsk State University Journal, 465, 13–21. https://doi.org/10.17223/15617793/465/2

  • Low, S. M. (2000). On the Plasa: The politics of public space and culture. University of Texas Press.

  • Mamonova, V. A. (2020). Hubris. Smeshchenie po konturu (predvaritel’nyi nabrosok k metamodernistskomu proektu) [Hubris. Displacement along the contour (preliminary sketch for a metamodern project)]. RuScience.

  • Meyer, K., & Uhle, C. (2015). Geoengineering and the accusation of hubris (THESys Discussion Paper No. 2015–3). Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. https://edoc.hu-berlin.de/bitstream/handle/18452/3783/3.pdf?sequence=1

  • Naberezhnaia reki Tura, Tiumen’ [The embankment of the Tura River, Tyumen]. (n.d.). Tripadvisor. https://www.tripadvisor.ru/Attraction_Review-g662362-d6406767-Reviewsor40Embankment_of_Tura_RiverTyumen_Tyumen_Oblast_Urals_District.html

  • Naberezhnaia reki Tury [The Tura River embankment]. (n.d.). Arkhitekturnoinzhenernaia gruppa IST. https://aigist.ru/project/naberezhnaya-reki-tury/

  • Neradovskaia, V. (2017, December 14). Urbanisty: V Tiumeni nalitso vse stolichnye protsessy, no gorozhane oshchushchaiut sebia v provintsii [Urbanists: In Tyumen, there are all the processes of the capital, but the townspeople feel like they are in the provinces]. NewsProm.ru http://newsprom.ru/news/Obschestvo/235547.html

  • Nugent, C. (2020, October 21). The climate is breaking down. Architect Bjarke Ingels has a masterplan for that. Time. https://time.com/collection/great-reset/5900743/bjarke-ingels-climate-change-architecture/

  • Oldenburg, R. (1989). The great good place: Cafés, coffee shops, community centers, beauty parlors, general stores, bars, hangouts, and how they get you through the day. Paragon House.

  • Owen, D. (2008). In sickness and in power: Illnesses in heads of government during the last 100 years. Praeger.

  • Pasnik, M., Grimley, C., & Kubo, M. (2015). Heroic: Concrete architecture and the New Boston. Monacelli Press.

  • Petrova, E. (2021, July 19). “U menia bylo videnie, chto Tiumen’ stanet gorodom budushchego”. Interv’yu s sozdatelem naberezhnoj Ilfatom Minulinym [“I had a vision that Tyumen would become the city of the future”. Interview with the creator of the embankment Ilfat Minulin]. 72.ru https://72.ru/text/gorod/2021/07/19/69904220/

  • Raymond, C. M., Brown, G., & Weber, D. (2010). The measurement of place attachment: Personal, community, and environmental connections. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 422–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.08.002

  • Revzin, G. (2021). Kak ustroen gorod: 36 esse po filosofii urbanistiki [How a city works: 36 essays on urban philosophy]. Strelka Press.

  • Sadler-Smith, E., Robinson, G., Akstinaite, V., & Wray, T. (2018). Hubristic leadership: Understanding the hazard and mitigating the risks. Organizational Dynamics, 48(2), 8–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2018.05.007

  • Sampson, K. A., & Goodrich, C. G. (2009). Making place: Identity construction and community formation through sense of place in Westland, New Zealand. Society and Natural Resources, 22(10), 901–915. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920802178172

  • Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2010). Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.006

  • Shevtsov, S. P. (2014). K voprosu o znachenii termina hybris v arkhaicheskii period. [On the issue of the term hybris in Archaic Greece]. Schole. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition, 8(2), 399–417. https://classics.nsu.ru/schole/assets/files/8-2-shev.pdf

  • Tewari, M. (2021, May 9). The architecture of hubris. Deccan Chronicle. https://www.deccanchronicle.com/opinion/columnists/080521/manish-tewari-the-architecture-of-hubris.html

  • Thadani, D. A. (2021). Form not content dictates the “smart” city. Journal of Traditional Building, Architecture and Urbanism, 2, 231–240. https://doi.org/10.51303/jtbau.vi2.513

  • Varlamov, I. (2018, August 16). Tiumen’—luchshii gorod Zemli? [Is Tyumen the best city on Earth?]. Varlamov.ru https://varlamov.ru/3048792.html

  • Zubets, O. P. (2012). Poniatie gordosti u Iuma: moral’naia sub”ektnost’ kak istochnik identichnosti Ia [Hume’s notion of pride: The moral agenсy as the basis for personal identity]. Eticheskaya Mysl’ | Ethical Thought, 12, 169–192. https://et.iphras.ru/article/view/2601

How to Cite
Bogomyakov, V., & Chistyakova, M. (2022). Tyumen Embankment: Urban Hubris as a Trigger for the Transformation of Urban Identity. Changing Societies & Personalities, 6(2), 334–349. doi:10.15826/csp.2022.6.2.178