“Discovery of Hinduism” in Religious Thought of the Bengal Renaissance


The aim of the article is to represent “Discovery of Hinduism” as a specific phenomenon of religious thought in the Bengal Renaissance of modern India. The phenomenon is a part of “Discovery of India” (Jawaharlal Nehru’s term) by Indian intellectuals, who thought on their country, society, civilization, history, and its future. The term “Hinduism” borrowed from the British missionaries and orientalists became convenient for the Bengal Renaissance intellectuals to think and comprehend their own native religious tradition. Based on the works by the Bengal Renaissance thinkers, the paper presents their role in creating the notion “Hinduism” as the term for all group of Indian religions, as well as in interpretation of it as one whole religion. The “discovery of Hinduism” began from the works by Rammohun Roy, who presented its image—tracing its origins back to monotheistic ideal of the Vedas. The “discovery of Hinduism” process can be divided into two phases: (a) invention of “monotheistic” image by the Brahmo Samaj, 1815–1857; (b) the perception and understanding of Hinduism at the second half of 19th century as “unity in diversity” and constructing of its concept by Neo-Hindu thinkers (Bankimchandra Chattopaddhyay, Swami Vivekananda, etc.). They created an image of Hinduism as a system of universal meanings and values and the core of social life and culture as well as the foundation cultural and political identity. The “discovery of Hinduism” by all Bengal intellectuals had many important consequences, one of which is positive and humanistic concept of Hinduism not only for their co-religionists and compatriots, but also for the outer world, primarily for the West. “Discovery of Hinduism” is an integral part of the history of thought, the kind of attempt “to gather India” in religious, social, and cultural spheres for public consciousness and mind.

Author Biography

Tatiana G. Skorokhodova, Penza State University, Penza, Russia

Tatiana G. Skorokhodova is a Doctor of Science (Philosophy), professor. Her research interests relate to Indian studies, modern Indian philosophy and intellectual history. The main research area is the Bengal Renaissance of the 19th–early 20th century. Tatiana G. Skorokhodova has proposed several methodological models to study national-cultural renaissances in modernizing non-Western societies. She is the author of 160 publications about the intellectual tradition and culture of the Bengal Renaissance, including eight books, the translations of works by Rammohun Roy, Devendranath Tagore, Swami Vivekananda, Prafullachandra Ray, and others. Among her most recent publications are “The Philosophy of Rammohun Roy: An Experience in Reconstruction” (2018); “Neo-Hinduism. Religious Thought and Practice in Colonial India” (2021); “Understanding of Other and Dialogue in Philosophy of the Bengal Renaissance” (2022).


  • Banerjee, S. (1970). The study of Indian history. In E. Kedourie (Ed.), Nationalism in Asia and Africa (pp. 225–244). World Publishing Co.

  • Bayly, C. A. (1988). Indian society and the making of the British Empire. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521250924

  • Bhuteshananda, S. (2006–2007). Sri Ramakrishna and his gospel (D. K. Das Gupta, Trans., Vols. 1–2). Advaita Ashrama.

  • Chatterjee, B. Ch. (1986). Sociological essays: Utilitarianism and positivism in Bengal (S. N. Mukherjee & M. Maddern, Trans. & Ed.). Wild Peony.

  • Dasgupta, S. (2007). The Bengal Renaissance: Identity and creativity from Rammohun Roy to Rabindranath Tagore. Permanent Black.

  • Dasgupta, S. (2011). Awakening: The story of the Bengal Renaissance. Random House India.

  • Flora, G. (1993). The evolution of positivism in Bengal: Jogendra Chandra Ghosh, Bankimchandra Chattopaddhyay, Benoy Kumar Sarkar. Istituto Universitario Orientale.

  • Hixon, L. (2011). Great swan: Meetings with Ramakrishna. Motilal Banarasidass. (Originally published 1992)

  • Justyński, J. (1985). Mysl społeczna i politiczna Renesansu Indyiskiego, od Rama Mohana Raya do Rabindranata Tagora [Social and political thought of the Indian Renaissance from Rammohun Roy to Rabindranath Tagore]. Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.

  • Pakhomov, S. V., & Fialko, M. M. (2013, May 15–17). Indologicheskii mif: K voprosu o proiskhozhdenii termina “induizm” [Indological myth: On the question of the origin of the term "Hinduism"] (Conference presentation). XXXIV Zograf Readings “Problems of an Interpretation of Indian Traditional text”, St. Petersburg, Russia.

  • Raychaudhuri, T. (1988). Europe reconsidered: Perceptions of the West in the nineteenth century Bengal. Oxford University Press.

  • Robertson, B. C. (1995). Raja Rammohan Ray: The father of modern India. Oxford University Press.

  • Roy, R. R. (1982). The English works of Raja Rammohun Roy, with an English translation of Tuhfatul Muwahhiddin (J. C. Ghose, Ed., Vols. 1–4). Cosmo.

  • Sen, A. P. (1993). Hindu revivalism in Bengal, 1872–1905: Some essays and interpretation. Oxford University Press.

  • Sen, A. P. (Ed.). (2011). Bankim’s Hinduism: An anthology of writing by Bankimchandra Chattopaddhyay. Permanent Black.

  • Tagore, D. (1909). The autobiography of Maharshi Devendranath Tagore (S. Tagore & I. Devi, Trans.). S.C. Lahiri & Co.

  • Vivekananda, S. (1998–2002). The complete works of Swami Vivekananda (Vols. 1–4). Advaita Ashrama.

  • Zaidi, Z. (1999). Currents of thought in Tuhfat-ul-Muwahiddin. Granthana: Indian Journal of Library Studies, 4(1–2), 43–56.

How to Cite
Skorokhodova, T. (2023). “Discovery of Hinduism” in Religious Thought of the Bengal Renaissance. Changing Societies & Personalities, 7(1), 173–187. doi:10.15826/csp.2023.7.1.224