Factors Shaping the Reproductive Behavior of Young Families in Russia: Data Triangulation

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/csp.2023.7.1.219

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to identify the factors that influence the reproductive behavior of young Russian families (heterosexual families consisting of two persons below the age of 35 with or without children). The analysis relies on the results of a mass questionnaire survey of young first-time married people (n = 893) conducted in 10 Russian regions in 2019–2020, in-depth interviews with young married people (n = 50) and an expert survey of managers and specialists working for social non-profits (n = 10), both conducted in 2021. Based on the data of the mass survey, we found that there are differences in the values of young families with children and without children. Moreover, young couples may choose to postpone childbearing not only for financial reasons but also because of their marital attitudes and reproductive strategies formed in the process of socialization. Marital behavior has a great influence on reproductive behavior. The differences in the respondents' attitudes to parenthood are determined by their gender roles, experience of having and raising children or absence of such experience. We found that state social support does not have a significant impact on the reproductive behavior of young families in Russia. Expert assessments show that the current measures of social support for young families do not cover all the needs of these families and that there is a perceived need for a more comprehensive assistance model.

Author Biographies

Tamara K. Rostovskaya, Institute for Demographic Research of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

Tamara K. Rostovskaya, Doctor of Science (Sociology), Professor, Deputy Director for Research of the Institute for Demographic Research – Branch of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. She has published more than 600 research works. Her research interests cover such themes, as sociology of family, sociology of youth, state family-demographic policy, fertility, migration, measures of social support, demographic education.

Ekaterina N. Vasilieva, Institute for Demographic Research of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

Ekaterina N. Vasilieva, Doctor of Science (Sociology), Associate Professor, Principal Researcher of the Institute for Demographic Research – Branch of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. She has published more than 100 research articles in the fields of sociology of family, economic sociology (youth economic activity), measures of social support of the population.

Veronika N. Kholina, Peoples Friendship University of Russia (RUDN), Moscow, Russia

Veronika N. Kholina, Candidate of Sciences (Geography), Departmental Head, Associate Professor, Department of Regional Economics and Geography, Faculty of Economics, RUDN University. She has published 190 research articles investigating the topics of geographical education and the spatial economic structure of various countries.

References


  • Aries, P. (1980). Two successive motivations for the declining birth rate in the West. Population and Development Review, 6(4), 645–650. https://doi.org/10.2307/1972930

  • Bagirova, A. P., & Ilyshev, A. M. (2009). Faktory reproduktivnogo povedeniia naseleniia (analiz mezhstranovykh i mezhregional'nykh razlichii) [Factors for reproductive behavior (cross-national and cross-regional differences)]. Sotsiologicheskie Issledovaniya, 2, 37–46.

  • Bergsvik, J., Fauske, A., & Hart, R. K. (2021). Can policies stall the fertility fall? A systematic review of the (quasi-) experimental literature. Population and Development Review, 47(4), 913–964. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12431

  • Bognar, G. (2019). Overpopulation and procreative liberty. Ethics, Policy & Environment, 22(3), 319–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2019.1652232

  • Buttner, T., & Lutz, W. (1990). Estimating fertility responses to policy measures in the German Democratic Republic. Population and Development Review, 16(3), 539–555. https://doi.org/10.2307/1972835

  • Feng, W., Cai, Y., & Gu, B. (2013). Population, policy and politics: How will history judge China’s one-child policy? Population and Development Review, 38(Suppl.), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2013.00555.x

  • Hoem, J. M. (2008). Overview chapter 8: The impact of public policies on European fertility. Demographic Research, 19, Article 10, 249–260. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.10

  • Mintrud predstavil pravila naznacheniia posobii dlia beremennykh i odinokikh roditelei na detei ot 8 do 17 let [The Ministry of Labor presented the rules for the assignment of benefits for pregnant and single parents with children from 8 to 17 years]. (2021, May 25). Official website of the Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of the Russian Federation. https://mintrud.gov.ru/social/328

  • O kontseptsii gosudarstvennoi politiki v otnoshenii molodoi sem'i [On the Concept of the State Policy in Relation to Young Family]. Letter from the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation AF-163/06. (2007, May 8). https://docs.cntd.ru/document/902060617

  • O molodezhnoi politike v Rossiiskoi Federatsii [On Youth Policy in the Russian Federation]. Federal Law of the Russian Federation No. 489-FZ. (2020, December 30). http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001202012300003

  • Osipov, G. V., & Ryazantsev, S. V. (2014). Demograficheskaia politika v Rossii: transformatsiia, rezul'taty, perspektivy [Demographic policy in Russia: Transformation, results, prospects]. Vestnik Rossiiskoi akademii nauk, 84(11), 963–972. https://doi.org/10.7868/S0869587314110127

  • Rindfuss, R. R., Morgan, S. P., & Swicegood, G. (2020). First births in America: Changes in the timing of parenthood. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520332508 (Originally published 1988)

  • Rostovskaya, T. K., & Kuchmaeva, O. V. (2020). Transformatsiia obraza zhelaemoi modeli sem'i u raznykh pokolenii: rezul'taty vserossiiskogo sotsiologicheskogo issledovaniia [Transformation of the desired family model in different generations: Results of the All-Russian sociological study]. RUDN Journal of Sociology, 20(3), 527–545. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2020-20-3-527-545

  • Rostovskaya, T. K., Zolotareva, O. A., & Vasilieva, E. N. (2022). Modeli matrimonial'nogo i reproduktivnogo povedeniia rossiiskoi molodezhi [Models of matrimonial and reproductive behavior of Russian youth]. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 15(3), 184–199. https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2022.3.81.10

  • Tan, P. L., Morgan, S. P., & Zagheni, E. A. (2016). A case for “reverse one-child” policies in Japan and South Korea? Examining the link between education costs and lowest-low fertility. Population Research and Policy Review, 35(3), 327–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-016-9390-4

  • van der Lippe, T., & van Dijk, L. (2002). Comparative research on women's employment. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 221–241. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.140833

  • Vishnevsky, A. G. (2019). Demografiia v natsional''nykh proektakh: Kak opredelit'' prioritety? [Demography in national projects: How to determine priorities?]. Nauchnye trudy Vol'nogo Ekonomicheskogo Obshchestva Rossii, 217(3), 100–119.

  • Zaidi, B., & Morgan, P. S. (2017). The second demographic transition theory: A review and appraisal. Annual Review of Sociology, 43, 473–492. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053442

Published
2023-04-10
How to Cite
Rostovskaya, T., Vasilieva, E., & Kholina, V. (2023). Factors Shaping the Reproductive Behavior of Young Families in Russia: Data Triangulation. Changing Societies & Personalities, 7(1), 72–87. doi:10.15826/csp.2023.7.1.219
Citation Formats
Issue
Vol. 7, No. 1 (2023)
Section
Articles