V. V. Lapin, A. I. Miller (Eds.) (2021). Simvolicheskie aspekty politiki pamiati v sovremennoi Rossii i vostochnoi Evrope [Symbolic aspects of the politics of memory in modern Russia and Eastern Europe]. EUSP Press

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/csp.2022.6.3.197

Author Biographies

Olga F. Rusakova, Institute for Philosophy and Law, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Yekaterinburg, Russia

Olga F. Rusakova, Dr. Sci. (Political Sciences), Professor, Head of the Philosophy Department at the Institute for Philosophy and Law, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Deputy Chairman of the Dissertation Council (Ural Federal University; historical and political sciences), Editor-in-Chief of the Diskurs-Pi scientific journal. Her research interests are generally devoted to discourse analysis, primarily to the discourse of modern political philosophy.  She has published numerous works contributing to soft power, mobility, and media discourse studies; she is also acknowledged for developing a peculiar discourse of travelogue. However, her most recent research focuses on the politics of memory, where she confirms her commitment to broadening horizons of contemporary discourse analysis.

Ekaterina G. Gribovod, Institute for Philosophy and Law, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Yekaterinburg, Russia

Ekaterina G. Gribovod, Cand. Sci. (Political Sciences), Researcher at the Institute for Philosophy and Law, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. She investigates challenges of digital society and global mediatization in terms of political communications and media discourse, contributing in particular to the study of mediatization of politics. Her most recent research focuses on the politics of memory, where she has been conducting analysis of different commemorative practices.

Yan Yu. Moiseenko, Institute for Philosophy and Law, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Yekaterinburg, Russia

Yan Yu. Moiseenko is a Junior Researcher at the Institute for Philosophy and Law, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. His PhD research focuses on the phenomenon of conformity as the ontological foundation of modern political ideologies and political systems in general. In order to undertake this investigation, he is implementing Martin Heidegger’s approach to studying conformity, which creates a broader philosophical framework for the research. His academic interests also include the politics of memory, with the collective imagination of the past being the main concept under consideration.

References


  • Achkasov, V. A. (2012). Rol’ politicheskikh i intellektual’nykh elit postkommunisticheskikh gosudarstv v proizvodstve “politiki pamiati” [The role of political and intellectual elites of post-communist states in production of “politics of memory”]. In O. Iu. Malinova (Ed.), Simvolicheskaia politika ( pp. 1 26–148). INION RAN.

  • Kovba, D. M., Gribovod, E. G. (2020). Osobennosti formirovaniia i realizatsii politiki pamiati o Velikoi Otechestvennoi voine na postsovetskom prostranstve [Features of the formation and implementation of the memory politics of the Great Patriotic War in the post-Soviet space]. Discourse-P, 2(39), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.24411/1817-9568-2020-10204

  • Malinova, O. Iu. (2015). Aktual’noe proshloe: Simvolicheskaia politika vlastvuiushchei elity i dilemmy rossiiskoi identichnosti [Relevant past: Symbolic politics of the ruling elite and the dilemmas of Russian identity]. Rossiiskaia politicheskaia entsiklopediia.

  • Malinova, O. Iu. (2018). Politika pamiati kak oblast’ simvolicheskoi politiki [The politics of memory as a field of symbolic politics]. In A. I. Miller & D. V. Efremenko (Eds.), Metodologicheskie voprosy izucheniia politiki pamiati (pp. 27–53). Nestor–Istoriia.

  • Miller, A. I., & Efremenko, D. V. (Eds.). (2020). Politika pamiati v sovremennoi Rossii i stranakh vostochnoi Evropy. Aktory, instituty, narrativy [The politics of memory in contemporary Russia and in countries of Eastern Europe. Actors, insitutes, narratives.]. EUSP Press.

  • Nelina, L. P. (2020). Podkhody k opredeleniiu kontseptov memory studies v rossiiskoi istoriografii [Approaches to defining the concepts of memory studies in Russian historiography]. Vestnik of the Mari State University. Chapter “History. Law”, 6(3), 244–253. https://doi.org/10.30914/2411-3522-2020-6-3-244-253

  • Rusakova, O. F., & Rusakov, V. M. (2011). PR-Diskurs: Teoretiko-metodologicheskii analiz [PR-discourse: Theoretical and methodological analysis]. Diskurs-P.

  • Rusakova, O. F., Rusakov, V. M. (2019). Diskurs postpravdy kak mediatekhnologiia politiki postpamiati [Post-truth discourse as a media technology of the politics of postmemory]. Discourse-P, 2(35), 10–27. https://doi.org/10.17506/dipi.2019.35.2.1027

  • Torfing, J. (2005). Discourse theory: Achievements, arguments, and challenges. In D. Howard & J. Torfing (Eds.), Discourse theory in European politics: Identity, policy and governance (pp. 1–32). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523364_1

Published
2022-10-10
How to Cite
Rusakova, O., Gribovod, E., & Moiseenko, Y. (2022). V. V. Lapin, A. I. Miller (Eds.) (2021). Simvolicheskie aspekty politiki pamiati v sovremennoi Rossii i vostochnoi Evrope [Symbolic aspects of the politics of memory in modern Russia and Eastern Europe]. EUSP Press. Changing Societies & Personalities, 6(3), 696–699. doi:10.15826/csp.2022.6.3.197
Citation Formats
Issue
Vol. 6, No. 3 (2022)
Section
Book Reviews