Moral Choice and the Concept of Evil in Military Narratives of Orthodox Christians

Abstract

The article contributes critically to the current discussion of militant piety in Russian Orthodox Christianity. It argues for a more historically informed use of the notion of militant piety, which can benefit from critical discourse analysis of personal narratives and the focus on lived experience and lived religion of Orthodox Christians who were involved in wars. The article analyses ego-documents collected in two recent volumes: the first showcases the stories of Orthodox clergy and believers in WWII; the second volume gives voice to army officers of late Soviet wars. Both volumes mold personal accounts into a larger narrative with the view to provide Orthodox believers with discursive means for reflection upon wars and to offer an exemplary Orthodox Christian attitude to war. In these narratives, beliefs and principles were understood by religious people not abstractly but in the context of their individual and collective experience. The first narrative reveals how the course of the Great Patriotic War changed the Orthodox Christians’ attitudes from initial self-sacrificial service in defense of the Motherland to waging the sacred war against the Antichrist forces of evil and later to ensuring the retribution for Nazi criminals who were interpretatively exempt from Christian commandment of love. The second narrative does not present a normative ideal of an Orthodox warrior but rather it sheds light on real “militant piety”, on practical religiosity of soldiers and officers, who built their relationship with God and religion in the context of their professional activity, regularly described as “work”. Christian doctrine of love and forgiveness in its abstract form would be inapplicable in this “work”. In personal accounts, however, Orthodox Christian ethics is adapted to the circumstances of the military service and is transformed into the lived religion based on the principles of self-sacrifice, loyalty, and duty.

Author Biography

Andrey S. Menshikov, Ural federal University, Yekaterinburg, Russia

Andrey S. Menshikov is an Associate Professor at the Department of Philosophy, Ural Institute of Humanities, Ural Federal University. His principal research interests are tolerance, moral reasoning, multiple modernity, religion in public space, and inter-confessional relations.

References


  • Ammerman, N. T. (Ed.). (2007). Everyday religion: Observing modern religious lives. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195305418.001.0001

  • Ammerman, N. T. (2021). Studying lived religion: Contexts and practices. New York University Press.

  • Berean Standard Bible. (2021). https://berean.bible/index.html

  • Doklad Mitropolita Aleksiia [Report of Metropolitan Alexius]. (1943, January). Zhurnal Moskovskoi Patriarkhii, 9–13. http://www.jmp.ru/ya43.php?ys=43&my=01&rm=&sr=430105

  • English Standard Version Bible. (2001). ESV Online. https://esv.literalword.com/

  • Galitskii, S. G. (Ed.). (2011). Iz smerti v zhizn’... Svidetel’stva voinov o pomoshchi Bozh’ei [From death to life... Soldiers’ accounts of God’s help]. Grad Dukhovnyi.

  • Hjelm, T. (2016). Theory and method in critical discursive study of religion: An outline. In F. Wijsen & K. von Stuckrad (Eds.), Making religion: Theory and practice in the discursive study of religion (pp. 15–34). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004309180_003

  • Khar’iuzov, N. (1945, May). Mozhno li prostit’ fashistov? [Can the Fascists be forgiven?]. Zhurnal Moskovskoi Patriarkhii, 44–47. http://www.jmp.ru/ya43.php?ys=45&my=05&rm=STAT&sr=450516

  • Knorre, B. (2015). “Bogoslovie voiny” v postsovetskom rossiiskom pravoslavii [“Theology of war” in Post-Soviet Russian Orthodoxy]. Stranitsy: Bogoslovie. Kul’tura. Obrazovanie, 19(4), 559–578.

  • Knorre, B., & Zygmont, A. (2020). “Militant piety” in 21st-century Orthodox Christianity: Return to classical traditions or formation of a new theology of war? Religions, 11(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11010002

  • New International Version Bible. (2011). Biblica. https://www.biblica.com/online-bible/

  • Obrashchenie Sobora episkopov Russkoi Pravoslavnoi Tserkvi ko vsem khristianam mira [Address of the Council of the Russian Orthodox Church to all Christians of the world]. (1943). Zhurnal Moskovskoi Patriarkhii, 1, 14–16. http://www.jmp.ru/ya43.php?ys=43&my=01&rm=&sr=430107

  • Ot soldata do generala: Vospominaniia o voine [From soldier to general: Memories of the war] (Vols. 1–18). (2003–2016). Akademiia istoricheskikh nauk. http://www.ainros.ru/toma.htm?ser_id=1

  • Polozhenie o voennom dukhovenstve Russkoi Pravoslavnoi Tserkvi v Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Regulations on the military clergy of the Russian Orthodox Church in the Russian Federation]. (2013, December 26). Official website of the Moscow Patriarchate. http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/3481010.html

  • Vasil’eva, O. Iu., Kudriavtsev, I. I., & Lykova, L. A. (Eds.). (2009). Russkaia pravoslavnaia tserkov’ v gody Velikoi Otechestvennoi voiny 1941–1945 gg. Sbornik dokumentov [Russian Orthodox Church in the years of the Great Patriotic War of 1941–1945. Collection of documents]. Izdatel’stvo Krutitskogo podvor’ia.

  • Voyno-Iasenetsky, L. (1944, February). Pravednyi sud naroda [Just tribunal of the people]. Zhurnal Moskovskoi Patriarkhii, 26–28.

  • Zobern, V. (Ed.). (2014). Bog i Pobeda: Veruiushchie v velikikh voinakh za Rossiiu [God and victory: Believers in the Great Wars for Russia]. Eksmo.

  • Zygmont, A. I., & Knorre, B. K. (2019). Voiny, mstiteli, mucheniki: Agiologiia militantnogo diskursa v sovremennom rossiiskom pravoslavii [Warriors, avengers, martyrs: Hagiology of the militant discourse in contemporary Russian Orthodoxy]. Studia Religiosa Rossica: Russian Journal of Religion, 2, 11–35. https://doi.org/10.28995/2658-4158-2019-2-11-35

Published
2022-12-30
How to Cite
Menshikov, A. (2022). Moral Choice and the Concept of Evil in Military Narratives of Orthodox Christians. Changing Societies & Personalities, 6(4), 733–749. doi:10.15826/csp.2022.6.4.200
Section
Essays