Contradictions in the Development of the Welfare Non-Profit Sector in Russia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/csp.2023.7.3.240

Abstract

The article focuses on the core contradictions within the development of the social non-profit sector in Russia. The empirical basis of the study comprises statistical data, legal documents regulating the social services’ sphere, research data from previous studies conducted in Russia, as well as qualitative data collected for this study. The introduction provides background information on the stages of reforming the social service system in Russia. The first part is devoted to the contradictions between international trends and Russian patterns.  In line with a neoliberal approach, non-profit NGOs play a significant role as key actors in social work providing social services for different client groups. At the same time, they are not independent and Russian civil society is not yet strong enough to realize social rights of citizens. In the next section, some of the key issues of interaction between the government and NGOs are discussed. An analysis of the current situation demonstrates that while a social partnership between the state and NGOs is affirmed by authorities on official level, in practice, the state still dominates the social sector. The article then focuses on how Russian NGOs have reoriented their efforts toward financial sustainability through government support.

Author Biographies

Olga I. Borodkina, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia

Olga I. Borodkina, Dr. Sci. (Sociology), Professor, Department of Social Work Theory and Practice, Faculty of Sociology, St. Petersburg State University.  She has authored more than 100 publications. Her primary academic interests include social policy, welfare state theory, theory of social work, and public health.

Alevtina V. Starshinova, Ural Federal University, Yekaterinburg, Russia

Alevtina V. Starshinova, Dr. Sci. (Sociology), Professor, Social Work Department, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin. She has authored more than 90 publications. Her research interests are focused on modern trends in the development of the welfare state, the Russian model of the welfare state, and non-governmental sector of social services.

Maksim A. Borodkin, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia

Maksim A. Borodkin, Researcher, St. Petersburg State University. He holds Master’s degrees in Sociology and Law. His primary research interests are related to the legal regulation of the non-profit sector, role of NGOs, and international migration.

References


  • Aasland, A., Berg-Nordlie, M., & Bogdanova, E. (2016). Encouraged but controlled: Governance networks in Russian regions. East European Politics, 32(2), 148–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2016.1167042

  • Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2003). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local government. Georgetown University Press.

  • Aidukaite, J. (2009). Old welfare state theories and new welfare regimes in Eastern Europe: Challenges and implications. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 42(1), 23–39. https://doi:10.1016/j.postcomstud.2009.02.004

  • Ascoli, U., & Ranci, C. (Ed.). (2002). Dilemmas of the welfare mix: The new structure of welfare in an era of privatization. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-4992-2

  • Auzan, A. A. (2004). Krizis ozhidanii i varianty sotsial’nogo kontrakta [The crisis of expectations and options for the social contract]. Obshchestvennye Nauki i Sovremennost, 5, 16–23.

  • Bae, K. B., & Sohn, H. (2018). Factors contributing to the size of nonprofit sector: Tests of government failure, interdependence, and social capital theory. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organization, 29(3), 470–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-017-9888-3

  • Benevolenski, V., & Toepler, S. (2017). Modernizing social service delivery in Russia: Evolving government support for non-profit organizations. Development in Practice, 27(1), 64–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2017.1259392

  • Bindman, E. (2015). The state, civil society and social rights in contemporary Russia. East European Politics, 31(3), 342–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2015.1063488

  • Borodkina, O. (2015). International trends in Russian social work. European Journal of Social Work, 18(4), 631–644. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2015.1049588

  • Borodkina, О. I. (2020). Social work transformation—National and international dimensions: The case of Russia. In S. S. M., R. Baikady, Ch. Sheng-Li, & H. Sakaguchi (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of global social work education (pp. 657–669). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39966-5_41

  • Borodkina, O. I., Starshinova, A. V., & Arkhipova, E. B. (2022). Sotsial’noe investirovanie: Problemy i strategii razvitiia [Social investment: Problems and development strategies]. Terra Economicus, 20(2), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.18522/2073-6606-2022-20-2-99-110

  • Borzaga, C., & Tortia, E. (2010). The economics of social enterprises: An interpretative framework. In C. Borzaga & L. Becchetti (Eds.), The economics of social responsibility: The world of social enterprises (pp. 15–33). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203851029

  • Brown, D. L., Moore, M. H., & Honan, J. (2003). Building strategic accountability systems for international NGOs. AccountAbility Forum: Insight in Practice, 2, 31–43.

  • Cantillon, B. (2011). The paradox of the social investment state: Growth, employment and poverty in the Lisbon era. Journal of European Social Policy, 21(5), 432–449. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928711418856

  • Clarke, J. (2007). Unsettled connections: Citizen, consumers, and the reform of public services. Journal of Consumer Culture, 7(2), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540507077671

  • Cook, L. (2007). Negotiating welfare in postcommunist states. Comparative Politics, 40(1), 41–62. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041507X12911361134398

  • Cook, L. J., Iarskaia-Smirnova, E., & Tarasenko, A. (2021). Outsourcing social services to NGOs in Russia: Federal policy and regional responses. Post-Soviet Affairs, 37(2), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2020.1853454

  • Crotty, J., & Ljubownikow, S. (2020). Creating organisational strength from operationalising restrictions: Welfare non-profit organisations in the Russian Federation. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 31(6), 1148–1158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00271-0

  • De Wit, A., Bekkers, R., & van Groenou, M. B. (2017). Heterogeneity in crowding-out: When are charitable donations responsive to government support? European Sociological Review, 33(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcw048

  • Deacon, B. (2000). Eastern European welfare states: The impact of the politics of globalization. Journal of European Social Policy, 10(2), 146–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/a012487

  • Ebrahim, A. (2003). Accountability in practice: Mechanisms for NGOs. World Development, 31(5), 813–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(03)00014-7

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (Ed.). (2002). Why we need a new welfare state. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199256438.001.0001

  • Evers, A. (1995). Part of the welfare mix: The third sector as an intermediate area. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 6(2), 159–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02353995

  • Fossati, F. (2018). Who wants demanding active labour market policies? Public attitudes towards policies that put pressure on the unemployed. Journal of Social Policy, 47(1), 77–97. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279417000216

  • Fröhlich, C., & Skokova, Yu. (2020). Two for one: Public welfare and regime legitimacy through state funding for CSOs in Russia. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 31(4), 698–709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00203-y

  • Grigoryeva, I. A. (2017). Sto let transformatsii sotsial’noi politiki v Rossii [One hundred years of social policy transformation in Russia]. The Journal of Social Policy Studies, 15(4), 497–514. https://doi.org/10.17323/727-0634-2017-15-4-497-514

  • Gugushvili, D., Lukac, M., & van Oorschot, W. (2021). Perceived welfare deservingness of needy people in transition countries: Comparative evidence from the Life in Transition Survey 2016. Global Social Policy, 21(2), 234–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468018121989520

  • Hemerijck, A. (2013). Changing welfare states. Oxford University Press.

  • Iarskaia-Smirnova, E., & Lyons, K. (2018). Social work in FSU countries: Mapping the progress of ‘the professional project’. European Journal of Social Work, 21(1), 114–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2016.1255926

  • Jakobson, L., & Sanovich, S. (2010). The changing models of the Russian third sector: Import substitution phase. Journal of Civil Society, 6(3), 279–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2010.528951

  • Krasnopolskaya, I. I., & Mersianova, I. V. (2015). Transformatsiia upravleniia sotsial’noi sferoi: Zapros na sotsial’nye innovatsii [Transformation of the social sphere administration: Demand for social innovations]. Public Administration Issues, 2, 29–52.

  • Kulmala, M. (2016). Post-Soviet “political”?: “Social” and “political” in the work of Russian socially oriented CSOs. Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization, 24(2), 199–224.

  • Kulmala, M., Rasell, M., & Chernova, Z. (2017). Overhauling Russia’s child welfare system: Institutional and ideational factors behind the paradigm shift. The Journal of Social Policy Studies, 15(3), 353–366. https://doi.org/10.7323/727-0634-2017-15-3-353-366

  • Kulmala, M., & Tarasenko, A. (2016). Interest representation and social policy making: Russian veterans’ organisations as brokers between the state and society. Europe–Asia Studies, 68(1), 138–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2015.1124842

  • Leoni, T. (2016). Social investment: A guiding principle for welfare state adjustment after the crisis? Empirica, 43(4), 831–858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-016-9348-0

  • Lewis, D. (2014). Non-governmental organizations, management and development (3rd ed.). Routledge.

  • Lewis, J., Knijn, T., Martin, C., & Ostner, I. (2008). Patterns of development in work/family reconciliation policies for parents in France, Germany, the Netherlands, and the UK in the 2000s. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 15(3), 261–286. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxn016

  • Ljubownikow, S., & Crotty, J. (2014). Civil society in a transitional context: The response of health and educational NGOs to legislative changes in Russia’s industrialized regions. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(4), 759–776. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764013482396

  • Mersianova, I. V., & Benevolenski, V. B. (2016). Preimushchestva NKO kak postavshchikov sotsial’nykh uslug: Aprobatsiia v rossiiskikh usloviiakh [The comparative advantages of NPOs as social welfare services providers: An examination in the Russian context]. Public Administration Issues, 4, 7–26.

  • Mikołajczak, P. (2018). The impact of the diversification of revenues on NGOs’ commercialization: Evidence from Poland. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 13(4), 761–779. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2018.037

  • Mosley, J. E. (2011). Institutionalization, privatization, and political opportunity: What tactical choices reveal about the policy advocacy of human service nonprofits. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(3), 435–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764009346335

  • Newman, J., & Clarke, J. (2009). Publics, politics and power: Remaking the public in public services. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446216651

  • Ob osnovakh sotsial’nogo obsluzhivaniia grazhdan v Rossiiskoi Federatsii [On the basics of social services for citizens of the Russian Federation]. Federal Law of the Russian Federation No. 442-FZ (2013, December 28). http://pravo.gov.ru/proxy/ips/?docbody=&nd=102170561

  • Orenstein, M. A. (2008). Postcommunist welfare states. Journal of Democracy, 19(4), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.0.0038

  • Pestoff, V., Brandsen, T., & Verschuere, B. (Eds.). (2012). New public governance, the third sector, and co-production. Routledge.

  • Powell, M., & Barrientos, A. (2004). Welfare regimes and the welfare mix. European Journal of Political Research, 43(1), 83–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2004.00146.x

  • Rao, N. (1996). Towards welfare pluralism: Public services in a time of change. Dartmouth.

  • Riabov, A. V., & Kurbangaleeva, E. Sh. (Eds.). (2003). Bazovye tsennosti rossiian: Sotsial’nye ustanovki. Zhiznennye strategii. Simvoly. Mify [The basic values of Russians. Social attitudes. Life strategies. Symbols. Myths]. Dom intellektual’noi knigi.

  • Ritchie, J., Spencer, L., & O’Conner, W. (2003). Carrying out qualitative analysis. In J. Ritchie & J. Lewis (Eds.), Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers (pp. 219–262). SAGE.

  • Salamon, L. M. (Ed.). (2002). The tools of government: A guide to the new governance. Oxford University Press.

  • Salamon, L. (2011). The new governance and the tools of public action: An introduction. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 28(5), 1611–1674.

  • Salamon, L. M., Sokolowski, S. W., & Haddock, M. A. (2017). Explaining civil society development: A social origins approach. Johns Hopkins University Press.

  • Salmina, A. A. (2015). Ustanovki naseleniia po otnosheniiu k sotsial’noi roli gosudarstva v Rossii i Germanii [Social attitudes of the population towards the social role of the state in Russia and Germany]. Vlast, 10, 171–181.

  • Sätre, A.-M., Varyzgina, A., & Granberg, L. (2020). The adaptation of local civic organizations in Russia to change: a case study of NGOS with a focus on social problems. The Journal of Social Policy Studies, 18(3), 509–522. https://doi.org/10.17323/727-0634-2020-18-3-509-522

  • Sidorina, T. Yu. (2010). Partnerstvo gosudarstva i institutov samoorganizatsii grazhdan v realizatsii sotsial’noi politiki (teoreticheskii aspekt) [Partnership of the state and institutions of self-organization of citizens in the implementation of social policy (theoretical aspect)]. Terra Economicus, 8(1), 117–129.

  • Skokova, Yu., & Fröhlich, C. (2022). Domestic funding for civil society in a non-democratic context: The example of the Presidential Grants in Russia. In Z. Kravchenko, L. Kings, & K. Jezierska (Eds.), Resourceful civil society: Navigating the changing landscapes of civil society organizations (pp. 67–91). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99007-7_3

  • Skokova, Yu., Pape, U., & Krasnopolskaya, I. (2018). The non-profit sector in today’s Russia: Between confrontation and co-optation. Europe–Asia Studies, 70(4), 531-563. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2018.1447089

  • Smith, S. R., & Lipsky, M. (1993). Nonprofits for hire: The welfare state in the age of contracting. Harvard University Press.

  • Soldatkin, А., & Blackburn, М. (2020). Institutional changes in state authorities collaborating with NGOs. The Journal of Social Policy Studies, 18(3), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.17323/727-0634-2020-18-3-523-538

  • Starshinova, A. V., & Borodkina, O. I. (2020). Deiatel’nost’ NKO v sfere sotsial’nykh uslug: Obshchestvennye ozhidaniia i regional’nye praktiki [NGOS’ activities in social services: Public expectations and regional practices]. The Journal of Social Policy Studies, 18(3), 411–428. https://doi.org/10.17323/727-0634-2020-18-3-411-428

  • Starshinova, A. V., & Borodkina, O. I. (2022). Sustainability strategies of socially oriented NPOs: Grant support mechanism. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 15(5), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.15838/esc.2022.5.83.12

  • Tarasenko, A. (2018). Russian non-profit organisations in service delivery: Neoliberal and statist social policy principles intertwined. Europe-Asia Studies, 70(4), 514–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2018.1463357

  • Taylor-Gooby, P., Heuer, J.-O., Chung, H., Leruth, B., Mau, S., & Zimmermann, K. (2020). Regimes, social risks and the welfare mix: Unpacking attitudes to pensions and childcare in Germany and the UK through deliberative forums. Journal of Social Policy, 49(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004727941800079X

  • Toepler, S., Pape, U., & Benevolenski, V. (2020). Subnational variations in government-nonprofit relations: A comparative analysis of regional differences within Russia. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 22(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2019.1584446

  • Toepler, S., Zimmer, A., Fröhlich, C., & Obuch, K. (2020). The changing space for NGOs: Civil society in authoritarian and hybrid regimes. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 31(4), 649–662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00240-7

  • van Oorschot, W., & Gugushvili, D. (2019). Retrenched, but still desired? Perceptions regarding the social legitimacy of the welfare state in Russia compared with EU countries. Europe-Asia Studies, 71(3), 345–364, https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2019.1583316

Published
2023-10-06
How to Cite
Borodkina, O., Starshinova, A., & Borodkin, M. (2023). Contradictions in the Development of the Welfare Non-Profit Sector in Russia. Changing Societies & Personalities, 7(3), 45–64. doi:10.15826/csp.2023.7.3.240
Citation Formats
Issue
Vol. 7, No. 3 (2023)
Section
Articles