A Case Against the Policy Mandating Vertically-Aligned Degrees in Philippine Graduate Education
Abstract
This paper delves into a policy that mandates vertically-aligned degrees. For context, many universities have adopted and are increasingly considering adopting this rule, which surprisingly has not faced much public criticism. This paper argues against the policy of mandating vertically-aligned degrees because it is, in the term of Frankfurt, bullshit and lacks merit due to administrators’ misconceptions about vertical alignment. It asserts that the policy mandating vertically-aligned degrees restricts academic freedom and presents students with a false dilemma, limiting opportunities for generalism and multipotentiality. Upon examination, the policy leads to the dehumanization and alienation of students, reshaping universities into undemocratic, tyrannical entities while stifling creativity and cross-disciplinary collaboration. This paper advocates for a more adaptable and inclusive graduate education framework. It underscores the necessity of prioritizing students’ individual needs and aspirations, urging for an environment where students have the agency to mold their educational journey. This paper strongly urges a shift away from inflexible educational mandates and highlights the significance of fostering an environment that champions autonomy, welcomes diverse academic pursuits, and enables the full exploration of students’ potential. Finally, it seeks to cultivate an educational landscape that fosters innovation and societal progress while honoring individual autonomy and development.
References
- Abed, R. T. (2004). Tyranny and mental health. British Medical Bulletin, 72(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldh037
- Althusser, L. (2014). On the reproduction of capitalism: Ideology and ideological state apparatuses (G. M. Goshgarian, Trans.). Verso Books.
- American Psychological Association. (n.d.). Identity foreclosure. In APA dictionary of psychology. https://dictionary.apa.org/identity-foreclosure
- Augoustinos, M. (1999). Ideology, false consciousness and psychology. Theory & Psychology, 9(3), 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354399093002
- Augustine, S. (1909). The confessions of St. Augustine (E.B. Pusey, Trans.; Book 1). P.F. Collier & Son.
- Biesta, G., & Tedder, M. (2007). Agency and learning in the lifecourse: Towards an ecological perspective. Studies in the Education of Adults, 39(2), 132–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2007.11661545
- Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. University of Chicago Press.
- Case, B., & Zucker, S. (2005). Horizontal and vertical alignment [PowerPoint slides]. DocSlides. https://www.docslides.com/test/horizontal-and-vertical-alignment-betsy-case-ph-d-sasha-zu
- Davies, L. (2008). Interruptive democracy in education. In J. Zajda, L. Davies, & S. Majhanovich (Eds.), Comparative and global pedagogies: Equity, access and democracy in education (pp. 15–31). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8349-5_2
- Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. Macmillan.
- Docherty, T. (2011). For the university: Democracy and the future of the institution. Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781849666336
- Epstein, D. (2021). Range: Why generalists triumph in a specialized world. Penguin.
- Eyerman, R. (1981). False consciousness and ideology in Marxist theory. Acta Sociologica, 24(1–2), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/000169938102400104
- Fallis, G. (2007). Multiversities, ideas, and democracy. University of Toronto Press.
- Fernández-Armesto, F. (2015, March 19). The passing of the polymaths. Times Higher Education. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/comment/columnists/the-passing-of-the-polymaths/2019113.article
- Frankfurt, H. G. (2005). On bullshit. Princeton University Press.
- Freire, P. (2007). Pedagogy of the oppressed. In P. Kuppers & G. Robertson (Eds.), Toward a sociology of education (pp. 374–386). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003060635-5
- Giray, L. (2021). Deborah H. Gruenfeld (2020). Acting with power [Book review]. Changing Societies & Personalities, 5(1), 143–145. https://doi.org/10.15826/csp.2021.5.1.126
- Gruenfeld, D. (2020). Acting with power: Why we are more powerful than we believe. Currency.
- Guinote, A., Judd, C. M., & Brauer, M. (2002). Effects of power on perceived and objective group variability: Evidence that more powerful groups are more variable. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(5), 708–721. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.5.708
- Haslam, N. (2006). Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 252–264. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4
- Heller, A. (2015). Renaissance man (R. E. Allen, Trans.). Routledge. (Originally published in Hungarian 1967)
- Holt, J. (1967). How children learn. Pitman.
- Hurst, C. (2015, July 17). New curricula and missed opportunities: Crowded curricula, connections, and “big ideas”. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 1–12. https://www.cimt.org.uk/journal/hurst.pdf
- Koliba, C. (2000). Democracy and education, schools and communities initiative: conceptual framework and preliminary findings. Educational Resources Information Center. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED451977.pdf
- Konner, M. (2003). The tangled wing: Biological constraints on the human spirit (2nd ed.). Henry Holt.
- Lammers, J., & Stapel, D. A. (2011). Power increases dehumanization. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14(1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430210370042
- Lapiz, G. (2015). Faculty qualifications across the vertically-articulated colleges of Cebu Normal University in the Philippines: The policy framework. European Scientific Journal, 11(16), 192–201. https://eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/view/5863
- Microsoft. (2023). Bing Image Creator [Image creation model]. https://www.bing.com/images/create/
- Mill, J. S. (1998). On liberty and other essays (J. Gray, Ed.). Oxford University Press.
- Murray, C. (2003). Human accomplishment: The pursuit of excellence in the arts and sciences, 800 B.C. to 1950. HarperCollins.
- Philippine Qualifications Framework. (n.d.). Domains and descriptors. National Government Portal of the Republic of the Philippines. https://pqf.gov.ph/Home/Details/4
- Richmond, C. E., Breitburg, D. L., & Rose, K. A. (2005). The role of environmental generalist species in ecosystem function. Ecological Modelling, 188(2–4), 279–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.002
- Roth, V. (2011). Divergent. Katherine Tegen Books.
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Self-regulation and the problem of human autonomy: Does psychology need choice, self-determination, and will? Journal of Personality, 74(6), 1557–1586. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00420.x
- Rysiew, K. J., Shore, B. M., & Leeb, R. T. (1999). Multipotentiality, giftedness, and career choice: A review. Journal of Counseling & Development, 77(4), 423–430. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1999.tb02469.x
- Saltman, K. J. (2018). The politics of education: A critical introduction (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351110396
- Sen, A. (2017). Collective choice and social welfare. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674974616
- Sweetman, K. (2012, April 10). In Asia, power gets in the way. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2012/04/in-asia-power-gets-in-the-way
- The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica. (n.d.). Academic freedom. In Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/academic-freedom
- Thompson, B. (n.d.). False dilemma. Bruce Thompson’ Fallacy Page. https://www.palomar.edu/users/bthompson/False%20Dilemma.html
- United Nations. (1948). Universal declaration of human rights. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights
- Wapnick, E. (2017). How to be everything: A guide for those who (still) don’t know what they want to be when they grow up. Harper One.
- Wilson, E. O. (1999). Consilience: The unity of knowledge. Vintage Books.
- Žižek, S. (2008). Violence. Picador.