Youth Participation in Citizen Science: Problems and Opportunities of Engagement in Russian Context

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/csp.2024.8.1.266

Abstract

We present a study of social participation in Citizen Science. The aim is to identify the problems and opportunities for attracting young people to Citizen Science using an example of genetic research projects held in 2020–2023 in Russia. The paper briefly reviews the development of the understanding and use of Citizen Science, as well as shows its application in genetic research. Empirical data were obtained in the course of qualitative and mass quantitative sociological studies. Scientific, organizational, and social contexts of wide involvement of people in scientific activity are shown. The narratives and motives of interested parties are analyzed. The study revealed limited development of Citizen Science practices in Russia, as well as the underdevelopment of the infrastructure for expanding social participation in scientific research. Moreover, professional scientists in natural sciences show contradictory attitudes and doubts about the involving volunteers in scientific research. We conclude that critical and doubtful attitudes towards Citizen Science decrease as practical experience of interaction is gained. According to data from mass sociological studies, there are significant differences in young people’s assessments of scientific activity and participation in volunteer practices, especially at school age. The necessity to draw public attention to the potential of using Citizen Science in a broad sense has been demonstrated.

Author Biographies

Gulnara F. Romashkina, University of Tyumen, Tyumen, Russia

Gulnara F. Romashkina, Dr. Sci. (Sociology), Cand. Sci. (Physics and Mathematics), Professor of the Department of Economic Sociology, University of Tyumen. She is a member of the Bureau of the Scientific and Coordination Council of the All-Russian project “Socio-Cultural Portraits of the Regions of Russia.” She is a certified expert in the scientific and technical field at the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation, an expert of the Russian Scientific Foundation. She has many years of experience in theoretical and applied sociological, mathematical, and economic research, being the scientific director and executor of works on grants of the Russian Scientific Fund (2023), Russian Humanitarian Scientific Fund (2006–2010, 2012–2014), the Russian Foundation for Fundamental Research (2016–2022). Currently, she is the Head of RSF grant 23-28-01321 “Analysis of the behavior of participants of the debt market under crisis situations in the related economies” and the Project Head of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation within FNTP GenTech for 2019–2027. The scientific interests of G. Romashkina include economic sociology, mathematical methods and models in economics, methods and means of decision-making, sociological research, methods of data analysis, sociocultural research. G. F. Romashkina is the author of more than 300 scientific publications.

Elena V. Andrianova, University of Tyumen, Tyumen, Russia; West-Siberian Branch of the Federal Research Sociological Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Tyumen, Russia

Elena V. Andrianova, Cand. Sci. (Sociology), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of General and Economic Sociology, University of Tyumen; Senior Researcher, West-Siberian Branch of the Federal Research Sociological Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Elena V. Andrianova has 20 years of experience in the field of sociological research. Her research has been supported by grants from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research and foreign scientific foundations. Under the guidance of E. V. Andrianova, a series of applied research works was implemented using a wide range of sociological methods. Since 2006, E. V. Andrianova has been conducting monitoring research within the framework of the interregional program “Problems of Socio-Cultural Evolution of Russia and its Regions” as a member of the coordination council of the program. Her main research interests focus on the following topics: socio-economic development, socio-cultural portrait of the region, development of rural areas, human capital, labor relations, labor motivation, economy, trust, food security, values, modern sociological theories. E. V. Andrianova is the chairwoman of the Tyumen Regional Branch of the Russian Society for Sociology.

Marina V. Khudyakova, University of Tyumen, Tyumen, Russian Federation

Marina V. Khudyakova, Cand. Sci. (Sociology), Associate Professor of the Department of General and Economic Sociology, University of Tyumen. Her scientific interests include economic behavior of social subjects, motivation of social and economic activity, consumer behavior, and sociology of markets. She is a Member of the Russian Society for Sociology. M. V. Khudyakova is the author of 40 research papers. She has many years of experience in applied sociological research, being an executor of works on grants from the Russian Humanitarian Science Foundation (2006, 2009, 2011) and the Russian Foundation for Fundamental Research (2020–2022).

References


  • Bonney, R., Cooper, C., & Ballard, H. (2016). The theory and practice of citizen science: Launching a new journal [Editorial]. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 1(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.65

  • Clark, J. (1991). Democratizing development: The role of voluntary organizations. Kumarian Press.

  • Cooper, C. (2016). Citizen science: How ordinary people are changing the face of discovery. The Overlook Press.

  • Federal crowdsourcing and citizen science catalog. (n.d.). CitizenScience.gov. https://www.citizenscience.gov/catalog/#

  • Gazoyan, A. G. (2020). Grazhdanskaia nauka kak instrument nauchnoi kommunikatsii: Analiz rossiiskoi praktiki [Citizen Science as an instrument of science communication: Analysis of Russian practice]. NOMOTHETIKA: Philosophy. Sociology. Law, 45(4), 810–817. https://doi.org/10.18413/2712-746X-2020-45-4-810-817

  • Gokhberg, L. M., Polyakova, V. V., & Fursov, K. S. (2020, April 9). Praktiki volonterstva v nauke [Volunteering practices in science]. HSE Institute for Statistical Studies and Economics of Knowledge. https://issek.hse.ru/news/356423135.html

  • Gosset, W. S. (1936). Co-operation in large-scale experiments. Supplement to the Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 3(2), 115–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/2983667

  • Irwin, A. (1995). Citizen science: A study of people, expertise and sustainable development. Routledge.

  • Kullenberg, C., & Kasperowski, D. (2016). What is citizen science?—A scientometric meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 11(1), Article e0147152. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147152

  • Muraveva, A., & Oleynikova, O. (2021). Rol’ universitetov v razvitii diskursa grazhdanskoi nauki [The universities’ role in developing citizen science discourse]. University Management: Practice and Analysis, 25(3), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2021.03.026

  • Ob ob’iavlenii v Rossiiskoi Federatsii Desiatiletiia nauki i tekhnologii [On the declaration of the Decade of science and technology in the Russian Federation]. (2022, April 25). Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 231. http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001202204250022?index=1

  • Obukhov, K. (2023). Resource potential of volunteers with professional knowledge for the development of regional socially oriented non-profit organizations in Russia. Changing Societies & Personalities, 7(3), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.15826/csp.2023.7.3.239

  • Pevnaya, M., Bannykh, G., & Tarasova, A. (2022). The culture of communicative participation of youth in Poland, Armenia and Russia for the urban development: Research results. Balkan Social Science Review, 20, 181–205. https://doi.org/10.46763/10.46763/BSSR2220181p

  • Pevnaya, M., & Tarasova, A. (2022). Volunteering of students: Social meaning and basis of motivated refusal. The Education and Science Journal, 24(10), 200–230. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2022-10-200-23

  • Pirozhkova, S. (2018). Printsip uchastiia i sovremennye mekhanizmy proizvodstva znanii v nauke [The principle of participation and modern mechanisms of knowledge production in science]. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 55(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.5840/eps20185519

  • Popova, N., Moiseenko, Y., & Beavitt, T. (2017). Conformity in modern science: An engine of societal transformation? Changing Societies & Personalities, 1(3), 237–258. https://doi.org/10.15826/csp.2017.1.3.017

  • Romashkina, G., & Lisitsa, A. (2022). Grazhdanskaia nauka—Za i protiv [Citizen science—Pros and cons]. Siberian Socium, 6(3), 39–59. https://doi.org/10.21684/2587-8484-2022-6-3-39-59

  • Ryan, S. F., Adamson, N. L., Aktipis, A., Andersen, L. K., Austin, R., Barnes, L., Beasley, M. R., Bedell, K. D., Briggs, S., Chapman, B., Cooper, C. B., Corn, J. O., Creamer, N. G., Delborne, J. A., Domenico, P., Driscoll, E., Goodwin, J., Hjarding, A., Hulbert, J. M., … Dunn, R. R. (2018). The role of citizen science in addressing grand challenges in food and agriculture research. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 285(1891), Article 20181977. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.1977

  • Shekera, E. A. (2022). Resursy grazhdanskoi nauki i sotsiologii (na primere konstruirovaniia sotsial’noi karty pitaniia dagestanskoi molodezhi v Sankt-Peterburge) [Resources of civil science and sociology (on the example the design of the social food map of Dagestan youth in St. Petersburg)]. Discourse, 8(4), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2022-8-4-91-108

  • The University of Oxford. (n.d.). Citizen science. In Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford University Press. https://www.oed.com/search/advanced/Meanings?textTermText0=citizen%20science&textTermOpt0=WordPhrase&dateOfUseFirstUse=false&page=1&sortOption=AZ

  • Verba, S., & Nie, N. (1987). Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. University of Chicago Press.

  • Vishnevskii, Iu. R. (Ed.). (2021). Molodezh’ o budushchem Rossii i o sebe: Vyzovy nastoiashchego i konstruirovanie gorizontov griadushchego (po materialam VIII etapa monitoringa dinamiki sotsiokul’turnogo razvitiia ural’skogo studenchestva 1995–2020 gg.) [Youth about the future of Russia and about themselves: Challenges of the present and construction of horizons for the future (based on materials from the 8th stage of monitoring the dynamics of socio-cultural development of the Ural students 1995–2020)]. Izdatel’stvo Ural’skogo Universiteta.

  • Vohland, K., Land-Zandstra, F., Ceccaroni, L., Lemmens, R., Perelló, J., Ponti, M., Samson, R., & Wagenknecht, K. (Eds.). (2021). The science of citizen science. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4

  • Volkova, А. (2019). Potentsial “grazhdanskoi nauki” v obshchestvennopoliticheskom razvitii [The potential of “citizen science” in socio-political development]. Socio-political studies, 1, 41–50. https://doi.org/10.24411/2658-428Х-2019-10337

  • Wiggins, А., & Wilbanks, D. (2019). The rise of citizen science in health and biomedical research. The American Journal of Bioethics, 19(8), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2019.1619859

  • Zhelezniak, V., & Seredkina, E. (2016). Grazhdanskaia nauka v epokhu vysokikh tekhnologii [Civil science in the era of high technologies]. Social’nye i gumanitarnye znanija, 10, 27–34.

Published
2024-04-05
How to Cite
Romashkina, G., Andrianova, E., & Khudyakova, M. (2024). Youth Participation in Citizen Science: Problems and Opportunities of Engagement in Russian Context. Changing Societies & Personalities, 8(1), 108–127. doi:10.15826/csp.2024.8.1.266
Citation Formats
Issue
Vol. 8, No. 1 (2024): Special Issue “Social Participation as a Factor That Changes Societies and Personalities”
Section
Articles in the Special Section