Digital Age Pedagogy: How European and Asian Business School Students Perceive Competence-Oriented Education

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/csp.2024.8.4.310

Abstract

This study examines the perceptions of competence-oriented educational practices in the digital age among business school students from European and Asian cultures. The statement emphasizes the need for essential competencies and maintaining a balance between study and personal life. The study sampled 800 undergraduate students, equally in Thailand and Bulgaria, to assess the impact of key competencies, digital literacy, and the integration of digital technologies on students’ educational choices. The findings revealed significant differences in how students from these two regions perceive the importance of these factors. Thai students tend to emphasize a balanced set of competencies but are less inclined to value digital skills as highly as their Bulgarian counterparts. In contrast, Bulgarian students place a greater emphasis on digital competencies, reflecting the European education system’s broader integration of digital literacy into its curricula. The evidence suggests that a global trend towards the recognition of digital technologies is crucial for achieving a study–life balance with minimal differences between the regions in this regard. This convergence suggests an emerging global consensus on the role of digital education in promoting lifelong learning. The authors recommend incorporating region-specific teaching philosophies to improve student engagement and promote a healthy study–life balance.

Author Biographies

Desislava Serafimova, University of Economics, Varna, Bulgaria

Desislava Serafimova is an Associate Professor with a PhD at the University of Economics in Varna, Bulgaria, where she is affiliated with the Department of Management and Administration. Her scholarly focus spans several areas within business and management studies, including organizational studies, corporate social responsibility (CSR), and business administration. Her work reflects a keen interest in management practices, particularly technological advancements and their implications for organizations.

Pensri Jaroenwanit, Khon Kaen University, Thailand

Pensri Jaroenwanit is an Associate Professor and former Dean of the Faculty of Business Administration and Accountancy at the Khon Kaen University, Thailand. She is an active researcher with over 81 citations for her work. Her fields of expertise cover business administration, accounting, and organizational management. She has been instrumental in developing curricula that address societal needs and promote 21st century skills, with a particular focus on programs that empower women entrepreneurs and strengthen communities both economically and socially.

Pongsutti Phuensane, Khon Kaen University, Thailand

Pongsutti Phuensane, PhD, is currently the Dean of the Faculty of Business Administration and Accountancy at the Khon Kaen University, Thailand. He holds a PhD from the University of Durham (2016), a MBA from the Khon Kaen University (2010), and a BA from Kasetsart University (1997). As a researcher, Dr. Phuensane has 117 citations for his work, with a focus on finance. His leadership aims to maintain the Faculty’s reputation for excellence in business education and research.

References


  • Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2019). On corporate social responsibility, sensemaking, and the search for meaningfulness through work. Journal of Management, 45(3), 1057–1086. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317691575

  • Alhumaid, K. (2019). Four ways technology has negatively changed education. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 9(4), 10–20.

  • Ali, F., Ciftci, O., Nanu, L., Cobanoglu, C., & Ryu, K. (2021). Response rates in hospitality research: An overview of current practice and suggestions for future research. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 62(1), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/1938965520943094

  • Al-khresheh, M. H. (2024). Bridging technology and pedagogy from a global lens: Teachers’ perspectives on integrating ChatGPT in English language teaching. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, Article 100218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100218

  • Başaran, M., Metin, Ş., & Vural, Ö. F. (2024). Meta-thematic synthesis of research on early childhood coding education: A comprehensive review. Education and Information Technologies, 29(16), 20795–20822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12675-2

  • Benítez-Márquez, M. D., Sánchez-Teba, E. M., Bermúdez-González, G., & Núñez-Rydman, E. S. (2022). Generation Z within the workforce and in the workplace: A bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 736820. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.736820

  • Błaszczyk, M., Popović, M., Zajdel, K., & Zajdel, R. (2023). Implications of the COVID-19 pandemic on the organization of remote work in IT companies: The managers’ perspective. Sustainability, 15(15), Article 12049. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151512049

  • Borowiec, A. A., & Drygas, W. (2023). Work–life balance and mental and physical health among Warsaw specialists, managers and entrepreneurs. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(1), Article 492. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010492

  • Buasuwan, P. (2018). Rethinking Thai higher education for Thailand 4.0. Asian Education and Development Studies, 7(2), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-07-2017-0072

  • Calvani, A., Fini, A., Ranieri, M., & Picci, P. (2012). Are young generations in secondary school digitally competent? A study on Italian teenagers. Computers & Education, 58(2), 797–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.004

  • Carretero, S., Vuorikari, R., & Punie, Y. (2017). DigComp 2.1: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/38842

  • Cheah, J.-H., Amaro, S., & Roldán, J. L. (2023). Multigroup analysis of more than two groups in PLS-SEM: A review, illustration, and recommendations. Journal of Business Research, 156, Article 113539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113539

  • Christensen, C. M., & Eyring, H. J. (2011). The innovative university: Changing the DNA of higher education from the inside out. Wiley.

  • Council of the European Union. (2018, May 22). Council Recommendation on key competences for lifelong learning (Text with EEA relevance). Publications Office of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.C_.2018.189.01.0001.01.ENG

  • Crick, T. (2020). Covid-19 and digital education: A catalyst for change? ITNOW, 63(1), 16–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/itnow/bwab005

  • Darling-Hammond, S., Ruiz, M., Eberhardt, J. L., Okonofua, J. A. (2023). The dynamic nature of student discipline and discipline disparities. PNAS, 120(17), Article e2120417120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2120417120

  • Deardorff, D. K. (2011). Assessing intercultural competence. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2011(149), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.381

  • Dipendra, K. C. (2023). Technology in education: A case study on Thailand. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54676/QVLZ7846

  • Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2013). Removing obstacles to the pedagogical changes required by Jonassen’s vision of authentic technologyenabled learning. Computers & Education, 64, 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.008

  • European Commission. (n.d.). Digital Education Action Plan (2021–2027). European Education Area. https://education.ec.europa.eu/focus-topics/digital-education/action-plan

  • Farrell, A. M., & Rudd, J. M. (2009). Factor analysis and discriminant validity: A brief review of some practical issues. Australia and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference 2009. In D. Tojib (Ed.), Proceedings of Australia and New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference. ANZMAC. https://publications.aston.ac.uk/id/eprint/7644/1/factor_analysis_ANZMAC_2009.pdf

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312

  • Francis, T., & Hoefel, F. (2018). “True Gen”: Generation Z and its implications for companies. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/consumer-packaged-goods/our-insights/true-gen-generation-z-and-its-implications-for-companies

  • Gavin, M., Poorhosseinzadeh, M., & Arrowsmith, J. (2022). The transformation of work and employment relations: COVID-19 and beyond. Labour and Industry, 32(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10301763.2022.2038353

  • Gervais, J. (2016). The operational definition of competency-based education. The Journal of Competency-Based Education, 1(2), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbe2.1011

  • Gill, A., & Lashine, S. (2003). Business education: A strategic marketoriented focus. International Journal of Educational Management, 17(5), 188–194. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540310484904

  • Gkrimpizi, T., Peristeras, V., & Magnisalis, I. (2023). Classification of barriers to digital transformation in higher education institutions: Systematic literature review. Education Sciences, 13(7), Article 746. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070746

  • Gleiser, P., Sakshaug, J. W., Volkert, M., Ellguth, P., Kohaut, S., & Möller, I. (2022). Introducing web in a mixed-mode establishment survey: Effects on nonresponse. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 185(3), 891–915. https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12809

  • Gopika, J. S., & Rekha, R. V. (2023). Awareness and use of digital learning before and during COVID-19. International Journal of Educational Reform. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10567879231173389

  • Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L. S., & Admiraal, W. (2020). A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, Article 101586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586

  • Hair, J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.

  • Hallinger, P., & Chatpinyakoop, C. (2019). A bibliometric review of research on higher education for sustainable development, 1998–2018. Sustainability, 11(8), Article 2401. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082401

  • Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2009). Developing undergraduate research and inquiry. Higher Education Academy.

  • Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., & Aston, R. (2017). What works and why? Student perceptions of “useful” digital technology in university teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education, 42(8), 1567–1579. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1007946

  • Hetmańczyk, P. (2024). Digitalization and its impact on labour market and education. Selected aspects. Education and Information Technologies, 29(9), 11119– 11134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12203-8

  • Infante-Moro, A., Infante-Moro, J.-C., & Gallardo-Pérez, J. (2019). The importance of ICTs for students as a competence for their future professional performance: The case of the Faculty of Business Studies and Tourism of the University of Huelva. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 8(2), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2019.7.434

  • Jack, A. (2020, January 22). The rise of the “sustainable” MBA. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/2a73f3de-339d-11ea-a329-0bcf87a328f2

  • Jaroenwanit, P., Abbasia, A., & Hongthong, P. (2022). Determinants of customers’ intention to use online food delivery platforms in Thailand. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 10(3), 747–758. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2022.4.007

  • Jongbloed, B., & Vossensteyn, H. (2016). University funding and student funding: International comparisons. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 32(4), 576–595. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grw029

  • Kenya Institute of Curriculum Development. (2018, February 3). Presentation on competency based curriculum activities. https://kicd.ac.ke/news/presentation-on-competency-based-curriculum-activities/

  • Kim, K. H. (2005). Learning from each other: Creativity in East Asian and American education. Creativity Research Journal, 17(4), 337–347. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1704_5

  • Kim, S., Raza, M., & Seidman, E. (2019). Improving 21st-century teaching skills: The key to effective 21st-century learners. Research in Comparative and International Education, 14(1), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499919829214

  • Kreber, C. (2009). Different perspectives on internationalization in higher education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 118, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.348

  • Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308

  • Kropp, B., Cambon, A., & Clark, S. (2021, April 15). What does it mean to be a manager today? Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2021/04/what-does-it-mean-to-be-a-manager-today

  • Leurcharusmee, S., Yamaka, W., Maneejuk, P., Thaiprasert, N., & Tuntichiranon, N. (2023). Economic survival duration of Thai workers during COVID-19. Economic Research—Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(2), Article 2106506. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2106506

  • Napathorn, C. (2022). The development of green skills across firms in the institutional context of Thailand. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 14(4), 539–572. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-10-2020-0370

  • Nurutdinova, A. R., Shakirova, D. S., Sabaeva, E. K., & Samarkina, N. O. (2023). The content modification within the framework of the massive open online courses (case study: International and Russian practices). In S. Goundar (Ed.), Massive open online courses—Current practice and future trends. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1001342

  • O’Reilly, C. A., III, & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324–338. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0025

  • Padmanabhanunni, A., Pretorius, T. B., & Isaacs, S. A. (2023). Satisfied with life? The protective function of life satisfaction in the relationship between perceived stress and negative mental health outcomes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(18), Article 6777. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20186777

  • Pérez García, Á., Sacaluga Rodríguez, I., & Moreno-Melgarejo, A. (2021). The development of the competency of “cultural awareness and expressions using movie-induced tourism as a didactic resource. Education Sciences, 11(7), Article 315. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11070315

  • Peter, D. I., & Ndinojuo, B.-C. E. (2024). Privacy awareness and social media: Personal data protection among Facebook10 and Instagram11 users. Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies, 6(3), 168–198. https://doi.org/10.46539/gmd.v6i3.489

  • Pimpa, N. (2003). The influence of peers and student recruitment agencies on Thai students’ choices of international education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 7(2), 178–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315303007002005

  • Prayuth, C., Kanokorn, S., & Pornpimon, C. (2014). Challenged strategies for driving to success in research of Khon Kaen University. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 662–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1215

  • Rhein, D. (2017). International higher education in Thailand: Challenges within a changing context. Journal of Alternative Perspectives in the Social Sciences, 8(3), 281–298.

  • Ruchiwit, M., Patchotasingh, M., & Phanphairoj, K. (2019). Strategies for creating innovators in Thailand’s higher education. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, 6, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2382120519863078

  • Rychen, D. S., & Salganik, L. H. (Eds.). (2003). Key competencies for a successful life and a well-functioning society. Hogrefe.

  • Salmi, J., & Bassett, R. M. (2014). The equity imperative in tertiary education: Promoting fairness and efficiency. International Review of Education, 60(3), 361–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-013-9391-z

  • Schlegelmilch, B. B. (2020). Why business schools need radical innovations: Drivers and development trajectories. Journal of Marketing Education, 42(2), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475320922285

  • Scott, T., & Guan, W. (2022). Challenges facing Thai higher education institutions financial stability and perceived institutional education quality. Power and Education, 15(3), 326–340. https://doi.org/10.1177_17577438221140014

  • Selwyn, N. (2016). Is technology good for education? Wiley.

  • Serafimova, D., & Andreeva, A. (2021). Digitalna transformatsiia na s’debnata sistema i neobkhodimost ot razrabotvane na kompetentnostni modeli [Digital transformation of the judiciary and the need of developing competence models]. Izvestiya: Journal of Varna University of Economics, 65(4), 394–408.

  • Singer, M., Callendar, C., Ma, X., & Tham, S. (2023). Differences in perceived influencer authenticity: A comparison of Gen Z and Millennials’ definitions of influencer authenticity during the de-influencer movement. Online Media and Global Communication, 2(3), 351–378. https://doi.org/10.1515/omgc-2023-0038

  • Škrinjarić, B. (2022). Competence-based approaches in organizational and individual context. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), Article 28. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01047-1

  • Soare, E. (2015). Perspectives on designing the competence based curriculum. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, 972–977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.259

  • Stanimirov, E. (2021). Transformatsiiata na obrazovatelnata sistema—Faktor za uspeshna kariera [Educational system transformation—A factor for a successful career]. In “Human Resource Management”: Proceedings of the International Scientific–Practical Conference organized by the University of Economics–Varna, 2021, September 24 (pp. 13–24). Nauka i ikonomika. https://conference.ue-varna.bg/hrm/wp-content/uploads/Proceedings/HRMConfProceeding2021.pdf

  • Sultan, S., Morgan, R. L., Murad, M. H., Falck-Ytter, Y., Dahm, P., Schünemann, H. J., & Mustafa, R. A. (2020). A theoretical framework and competency-based approach to training in guideline development. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 35(2), 561– 567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05502-9

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Pearson.

  • Tamim, R. M., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Abrami, P. C., & Schmid, R. F. (2011). What forty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning: A second-order meta-analysis and validation study. Review of Educational Research, 81(1), 4–28.

  • Thawesaengskulthai, N., Chatmarathong, A., & Koiwanit, J. (2024). Impact and policy supporting Thailand innovation driven enterprise: Orchestrating university innovation and entrepreneurship ecosystem with public and private stakeholders. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 13(1), Article 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-024-00371-x

  • Thirakulwanich, A., Dragolea, L., & Fekete-Farkas, M. 2020. Gamification and learning: Enhancing and engaging e-learning experience. Global Journal of Entrepreneurship and Management, 1(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.57585/GJEM.020.002

  • Timotheou, S., Miliou, O., Dimitriadis, Y., Sobrino, S. V., Giannoutsou, N., Cachia, R., Monés, A. M., & Ioannou, A. (2023). Impacts of digital technologies on education and factors influencing schools’ digital capacity and transformation: A literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(6), 6695–6726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11431-8

  • Tungkasamit, A., & Junpeng, P. (2012). The development of authentic assessment training curriculum for research-based learning class in higher education of Thailand. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 1168–1173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.047

  • van Weenen, H. (2000). Towards a vision of a sustainable university. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 1(1), 20–34.

  • Wilang, J. D. (2024). Exploring the mindsets of Thai undergraduate students: A comprehensive study of general and language-related beliefs. SAGE Open, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241262952

Published
2024-12-28
How to Cite
Serafimova, D., Jaroenwanit, P., & Phuensane, P. (2024). Digital Age Pedagogy: How European and Asian Business School Students Perceive Competence-Oriented Education. Changing Societies & Personalities, 8(4), 1006–1033. doi:10.15826/csp.2024.8.4.310
Citation Formats
Issue
Vol. 8, No. 4 (2024)
Section
Articles