Which Employees are Most Motivated to Share Knowledge – the Role of Age-Based Differentiation in Knowledge-Sharing Motivation

  • Neža Prelog University of Ljubljana, Republic of Slovenia
  • Fayruza S. Ismagilova Ural Federal University, Yekaterinburg, Russia
  • Eva Boštjančič University of Ljubljana, Republic of Slovenia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/csp.2019.3.1.060

Abstract

The problem of age diversity in the workplace is becoming increasingly important, especially because of the ageing workforce. Knowledge-sharing should therefore be encouraged among employees of different ages. The topic of this research is the role of age-based differentiation or intergenerational differentiation in motivation to share knowledge. Participating in this study were 202 employees of six Slovenian companies. The participants filled out the Knowledge-sharing Motivation Measure, translated into Slovenian for the purposes of this study, and The Intergenerational Differentiation in the Workplace Measure. Our objective was to find out how three different age groups differ in the subjective perceptions of knowledge-sharing motivation and how the perception of intergenerational differentiation is correlated with knowledge-sharing motivation. The results show that the youngest age group of employees feels the most discriminated against due to their age, but is also the most motivated to share knowledge when compared to the other two age groups. The correlation between the two measured constructs is not significant. The main findings are that it is important to acknowledge the younger age group of employees, since it seems to be the most vulnerable to intergenerational differentiation. Also, it is important to encourage older workers to share their valuable knowledge.

Author Biographies

Neža Prelog, University of Ljubljana, Republic of Slovenia

Neža Prelog is a psychologist from Ljubljana, Slovenia. She graduated at the University of Ljubljana and is working in the field of work and organizational psychology as human resource manager. Her professional career is focused especially on people and organization development. Her professional fields of interest include organizational transactional analysis and mindfulness.

Fayruza S. Ismagilova, Ural Federal University, Yekaterinburg, Russia

Fayruza S. Ismagilova is Professor of Psychology of the Ural Institute of Humanities at Ural Federal University. Her field of interest is work and organizational psychology.

Eva Boštjančič, University of Ljubljana, Republic of Slovenia

Eva Boštjančič is Slovenian psychologist, Associate Professor in Work and Organizational Psychology at the Department of Psychology at the University of Ljubljana.

References


  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. DOI: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

  • Arnett, D. B., & Wittmann, C. M. (2014). Improving Marketing Success: The Role of Tacit Knowledge Exchange Between Sales and Marketing. Journal of Business Research, 67(3), 324–331. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.01.018

  • Arnold, J., Silvester, J., Patterson, F., Robertson, I., Cooper, C., & Burnes, B. (2005). Work Psychology: Understanding Human Behaviour in the Workplace. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.

  • Bjursell, C. (2015). Organizing for Intergenerational Learning and Knowledge Sharing. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 13(4), 285–301. DOI: 10.1080/15350770.2015.1108952

  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social life. New York, NY: Wiley.

  • Bock, G. W., Lee, J. N., & Zmud, R. W. (2005). Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Forces, and Organizational Climate. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 87–111. DOI: 10.2307/25148669

  • Braithwaite, V. (2004). Reducing Ageism. In T. D. Nelson (Ed.), Ageism: Stereotyping and Prejudice Against Older Persons (pp. 311–337). Cambridge: The MIT Press.

  • Cai, H., Li, M., & Guan, P. (2016). Fostering Managers’ Knowledge-Sharing Behavior: The Impact of the Employee-Organization Relationship. Social Behavior and Personality, 44(4), 669–678. DOI: 10.2224/sbp.2016.44.4.669

  • Casimir, G., Lee, K., & Loon, M. (2012). Knowledge Sharing: Influences of Trust, Commitment and Cost. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(5), 740–753.

  • Cummings, J. N. (2004). Work Groups, Structural Diversity, and Knowledge Sharing in a Global Organization. Management Science, 50(3), 352–364.

  • De Guzman, A. B. (2014). A Structural Equation Modeling of the Factors Affecting an Age-Friendly Workplace. Educational Gerontology, 40, 387–400.

  • Felicijan, J. (2015). Prenos Znanja Starejših Zaposlenih na Mlajše Zaposlene v Organizaciji X (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Mednarodna Fakulteta za Družbene in Poslovne Študije, Celje.

  • Finkelstein, L. M., Ryan, K. M., & King, E. B. (2013). What do the Young (Old) People Think of Me? Content and Accuracy of Age-Based Metastereotypes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22(6), 633–657. DOI: 10.1080/1359432X.2012.673279

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Beliefs, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company

  • Floor, S. (2007). Knowledge Management Among the Older Workforce. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(4), 82–96.

  • Hsu, I. C. (2006). Enhancing Employee Tendencies to Share Knowledge – Case Studies of Nine Companies in Taiwan. International Journal of Information Management, 26(4), 326–338. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2006.03.001

  • Jelenko, J. (2015). The Intergenerational Differentiation in the Workplace Measure (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Faculty of Arts, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana. Slovenia.

  • Jiacheng, W., Lu, L., & Francesco, C. A. (2010a). A Cognitive Model of Intra-Organizational Knowledge-Sharing Motivations in the View of Cross-Culture. International Journal of Information Management, 30(3), 220–230. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.08.007

  • Jiacheng, W., Lu, L., & Francesco, C. A. (2010b). Intra-Organizational Knowledge-Sharing Motivations Measure. PsycTESTS.

  • Kanfer, R., & Ackerman, P. L. (2004). Aging, Adult Development and Work Motivation. Academy of Management Review, 29(3), 440–459. DOI: 10.5465/AMR.2004.13670969

  • Kelman, H. C. (1958). Compliance, Identification, and Internalization: Three Processes of Attitude Change. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2(1), 51–60. DOI: 10.1177/002200275800200106

  • Lauring, J., & Selmer, J. (2012). Knowledge Sharing in Diverse Organisations. Human Resource Management Journal, 22(1), 89–105.

  • Mahmood, A., Qureshi, A., & Evans, N. (2015). Deterrents to Knowledge-Sharing in the Pharmaceutical Industry: A Case Study. Journal of Knowledge Management, 19(2), 296–314. DOI: 10.1108/JKM-09-2014-0391

  • Nonaka, I. (1994). A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.5.1.14

  • Nottingham, A. (1998). Knowledge Management as the Next Strategic Focus. Proceedings of the 8th Annual BIT Conference. Manchester: Metropolitan University.

  • Ozlati, S. (2015). The Moderating Effect of Trust on the Relationship between Autonomy and Knowledge Sharing: A National Multi-Industry Survey of Knowledge Workers. Knowledge and Process Management, 22(3), 191–205. DOI: 10.1002/kpm.1474

  • Piktialis, D., & Greenes, K. A. (2008). Bridging the Gaps: How to Transfer Knowledge in Today’s Multigenerational Workplace. New York: The Conference Board. Research Report R-1428-08-RR.

  • Podobnik, I. (2009). Prenos Znanja v Organizaciji (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Fakulteta za management, Koper.

  • Rannuci, R. A., & Souder, D. (2015). Facilitating Tacit Knowledge Transfer: Routine Compatibility, Trustworthiness, and Integration in M & A’s. Journal of Knowledge Management, 19(2), 257–276. DOI: 10.1108/JKM-06-2014-0260

  • Reychav, I., & Weisberg, J. (2009). Good for Workers, Good for Companies: How Knowledge Sharing Benefits Individual Employees. Knowledge and Process Management, 16(4), 186–197. DOI: 10.1002/kpm.335

  • Remery, C., Henkens, K., Schippers, J., & Ekamper, P. (2001). Managing an Ageing Workforce and a Tight Labour Market: Views Held by Dutch Employers. Population Review and Policy Review, 22(1), 21–40. DOI: 10.1023/A:1023543307473

  • Soojin, L., Yongsu, Y., & Seokhwa, Y. (2015). Sharing My Knowledge? An Interactional Perspective. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30(8), 986–1002.

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986) The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 5, 7–24.

  • Taylor, E. Z. (2006). The Effect of Incentives on Knowledge Sharing in Computermediated Communication: An Experimental Investigation. Journal of Information Systems, 20(1), 103–116.

  • Taylor, P., & Walker, A. (1998). Policies and Practices Towards Older Workers: A Framework for Comparative Research. Human Resource Management Journal, 8(3), 61–76.

  • Zupančič, M. (2009). Spoznavni Razvoj v Srednji Odraslosti. In L. Marjanovič Umek & M. Zupančič (Ed.), Razvojna psihologija (pp. 728–744). Ljubljana: Znanstvenoraziskovalni inštitut Filozofske fakultete.

Published
2019-04-01
How to Cite
Prelog, N., Ismagilova, F., & Boštjančič, E. (2019). Which Employees are Most Motivated to Share Knowledge – the Role of Age-Based Differentiation in Knowledge-Sharing Motivation. Changing Societies & Personalities, 3(1), 52-67. doi:10.15826/csp.2019.3.1.060
Citation Formats
Issue
Vol. 3, No. 1 (2019)
Section
Research Notes