Dynamics of "Conservative" and "Progressive" Narratives in the Era of Digital Transformation in Political Communications

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15826/csp.2025.9.1.320

Abstract

This study explores the distinct characteristics and roles of “conservative” and “progressive” narratives as part of an ambivalent process of diachronically organizing symbolic collective representations and exploring their influence on the political positioning of national communities. The digitalization of political communications has increased the variability of “temporal representations.” New approaches are thus needed to frame the conflict between tradition and innovation within the political and cultural dynamics of contemporary actors. Political elites across national communities are influenced by their various perceptions of the pace of political change and their expectations of the “present” and “future.” They employ different criteria for what constitutes a “recurrence” or “continuity.” It is therefore increasingly important to understand the relationship between “temporal regimes” in political memory and the processes of traditionalization within the binary coding of political communications as “conservative” or “progressive.” Temporal regimes in political communications are shaped by a trend toward homogenizing a community’s temporal representations, which fosters more stable conditions for integrating perceptions of the past, present, and future. Traditionalization is critical in institutionalizing and maintaining models of political solidarity. It serves as an essential cultural resource for the temporal structuring of the political sphere and countering political inversion and arbitrariness by political actors. The crisis in the temporal regime of the “modern era,” as articulated by contemporary globalist elites, has significantly heightened the risks of political asynchronicity within the national memory of modern communities. Political elites and other actors are increasingly losing the ability to effectively control tradition-
making, often replacing it with radical conservative traditionalization or progressivism. Drawing on the theoretical and practical insights of modern cultural sociology and political anthropology, the authors propose new theoretical approaches to understanding the role of temporal dimensions in the reproduction of political order within the context of neoliberal digitalization strategies.

Author Biographies

Konstantin F. Zavershinskiy, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia

Konstantin F. Zavershinskiy is a Professor of Political Science at Saint Petersburg State University. His primary line of research focuses on the theory and methodology of politico-cultural studies and political legitimation, with a secondary line of research on the theory of symbolic politics and the anthropological dimensions of political processes. His latest research projects cover the theory and practice of the politics of memory and the social construction of political identity in contemporary society. Konstantin is the author of three books and more than 180 research and educational works in the subject areas of the theory of political culture, political legitimation, and cultural sociology of politics. Recent publications: Tradition in the political positioning of modern elites: Temporal dimensions (2024, in Russ); Political identity and national memory: The conflict of contemporary political narratives (2022, co-authored). 

Alexander I. Koryushkin, Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia

Alexander I. Koryushkin is an Associate Professor of Political Science at Saint Petersburg State University. His primary line of research focuses on the theory and philosophy of politics, history, philosophy, and methodology of contemporary political science, with a secondary line of research on the theory of symbolic politics and anthropological dimensions of political processes. His latest research project covers the political theory of science, technology, and innovation policy. His scientific output comprises two books and more than 60 scholarly and educational works in the fields of political science history, theory of political culture, theory of democracy, and discourse-network analysis of public policy. Recent publications: Political identity and national memory: The conflict of contemporary political narratives (2022, co-authored); Political socialization in a changing society: A crisis of value orientations or asynchronization of national memories? (2022, co-authored).

References


  • Alexander, J. C. (2006). The civil sphere. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195162509.001.0001

  • Alexander, J. C. (2012). Trauma: A social theory. Polity Press.

  • Assmann, A. (2017a). Raspalas’ sviaz’ vremen? Vzlet i padenie temporal’nogo rezhima Moderna [Time out of Joint? The rise and fall of the temporal regime of Modernity] (B. Khlebnikov, Trans.). Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. (Originally published in German 2013)

  • Assmann, A. (2017b). Transnational memory and the construction of history through mass media. In L. Bond, S. Craps, & P. Vermeulen (Eds.), Memory unbound: Tracing the dynamics of memory studies (pp. 65–80). Berghahn Books. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781785333019-005

  • Assmann, A., & Assmann, J. (2024). Gemeinsinn: Der Sechste, Soziale Sinn [Public spirit: The sixth, social sense]. C.H. Beck.

  • Assmann, J. (2010). Communicative and cultural memory. In A. Erll & A. Nunning (Eds.), Cultural memory studies: An international and interdisciplinary handbook (pp. 109–118). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110207262.2.109

  • Bachleitner, K. (2021). Collective memory in international relations. Oxford University Press.

  • Bauman, Z. (2017). Retrotopia. Polity Press.

  • Beckeld, B. (2022). Western self-contempt: Oikophobia in the decline of civilizations. Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501763205

  • Bexell, M., Jönsson, K., & Uhlin, A. (Eds.). (2022). Legitimation and delegitimation in global governance: Practices, justifications, and audiences. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192856111.001.0001

  • Bond, L., Craps, S., & Vermeulen, P. (Eds.). (2017). Memory unbound: Tracing the dynamics of memory studies. Berghahn Books. https://doi.org/10.3167/9781785333002

  • Buccitelli, A. B. (2018). Introduction. In A. B. Buccitelli (Ed.), Race and ethnicity in digital culture: Our changing traditions, impressions, and expressions in a mediated world (Vol. 1, pp. 1–18). ABC-CLIO.

  • Bulut, U. (2024, July 18). Unmasking progressivism: An interview with Stelios Panagiotou. The European Conservative. https://europeanconservative.com/articles/interviews/unmasking-progressivism-an-interview-with-stelios-panagiotou/

  • Coeckelbergh, M. (2022). Digital technologies, temporality, and the politics of coexistence. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17982-2

  • Dean, J. (2019). Critique or collectivity? Communicative capitalism and the subject of politics. In D. Chandler & C. Fuchs (Eds.), Digital objects, digital subjects: Interdisciplinary perspectives on capitalism, labour, and politics in the age of big data (pp. 171–182). University of Westminster Press. https://doi.org/10.16997/book29.n

  • Dellmuth, L., & Tallberg, J. (2023). Legitimacy politics: Elite communication and public opinion in global governance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009222020

  • Filippov, A. F. (2008). O poniatii teoreticheskoi sotsiologii [On the notion of theoretical sociology]. The Russian Sociological Review, 7(3), 75–114.

  • Friedman, J. (2019). PC worlds: Political correctness and rising elites at the end of hegemony. Berghahn Books. https://doi.org/10.3167/9781785336720

  • Fuchs, C. (2019). Karl Marx in the age of big data capitalism. In D. Chandler & C. Fuchs (Eds.), Digital objects, digital subjects: Interdisciplinary perspectives on capitalism, labour, and politics in the age of big data (pp. 53–71). University of Westminster Press. https://doi.org/10.16997/book29.d

  • Fukuyama, F. (2018). Against identity politics: The new tribalism and the crisis of democracy. Foreign Affairs, 97(5), 90–114.

  • Garde-Hansen, J. (Ed.). (2011). Media and memory. Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748647071

  • Gofman, A. B. (2015). Traditsiia, solidarnost’ i sotsiologicheskaia teoriia. Izbrannye teksty [Tradition, solidarity and sociological theory. Selected works]. Novyi khronograf.

  • Helgesson, S., & Svenungsson, J. (Eds.). (2018). The ethos of history: Time and responsibility. Berghahn Books. https://doi.org/10.3167/9781785338847

  • Hobsbawm, E. (2012). Introduction: Inventing tradition. In E. Hobsbawm & R. Terrence (Eds.), The invention of tradition (pp. 1–14). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107295636.001

  • Hoskins, A. (2017). The restless past: An introduction to digital memory and media. In A. Hoskins (Ed.), Digital memory studies: Media pasts in transition (pp. 1–24). Routledge.

  • Kaspe, S. (2022). V etom shkafu mnogo skeletov: Politicheskoe ispol’zovanie traditsii v sovremennoi Rossii [Many skeletons in this closet: The political use of tradition in modern Russia]. The Russian Sociological Review, 21(1), 9–37. https://doi.org/10.17323/1728-192x-2022-1-9-37

  • Kirk, R. (2001). The conservative mind: From Burke to Eliot. Regnery.

  • Kirk, R. (2023). The politics of prudence. Regnery.

  • Krause, P. (2023, May 16). Understanding progressivism. Discourses on Minerva. https://minervawisdom.com/2023/05/16/understanding-progressivism/

  • Lakoff, G. (2009). The political mind: A cognitive scientist’s guide to your brain and its politics. Penguin Books.

  • Luhmann, N. (2001). Vlast’ [Power]. Praxis. (Originally published in German 1988)

  • Luhmann, N. (2006). Differentsiatsiia [Differentiation]. Logos. (Originally published in German 1997)

  • Luhmann, N. (2007). Vvedenie v sistemnuiu teoriiu [Introduction to systems theory]. Logos. (Originally published in German 2002)

  • Malinova, O. Iu. (2020). Rezhim pamiati kak instrument analiza: Problemy kontseptualizatsii [Memory regime as a tool of analysis: Problems of conceptualization]. In A. I. Miller & D. V. Efremenko (Eds.), Politika pamiati v sovremennoi Rossii i stranakh Vostochnoi Evropy: Aktory, instituty, narrativy [Politics of memory in contemporary Russia and in the countries of Eastern Europe: Actors, institutions, and narratives] (pp. 26–39). EUSP Press.

  • Olick, J. K. (2016). The sins of the fathers: Germany, memory, method. University of Chicago Press.

  • Pinker, S. (2018). Enlightenment now: The case for reason, science, humanism, and progress. Viking.

  • Pogačar, M. (2017). Culture of the past: Digital connectivity and dispotentiated futures. In A. Hoskins (Ed.), Digital memory studies: Media pasts in transition (pp. 27– 47). Routledge.

  • Robles-Morales, J. M., & Córdoba-Hernández, A. M. (2019). Digital political participation, social networks and big data: Disintermediation in the era of web 2.0. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27757-4

  • Roeber, B. (2024). Political humility: The limits of knowledge in our partisan political climate. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003439547

  • Schradie, J. (2019). The revolution that wasn’t: How digital activism favors conservatives. Harvard University Press.

  • Smith, P. (2005). Why war? The cultural logic of Iraq, the Gulf War, and Suez. University of Chicago Press.

  • Sudakov, S. S. (2004). Poniatie traditsii v sovremennom amerikanskom liberalizme [The notion of tradition in contemporary American liberalism] [Candidate’s dissertation, Kaliningrad State University]. DisserCat. https://www.dissercat.com/content/ponyatie-traditsii-v-sovremennom-amerikanskom-liberalizme

  • Torres, F. (2021). Temporal regimes: Materiality, politics, technology. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003180876

  • Torres, F., & Rosa, H. (2021). Acceleration theory, temporal regimes, and politics today. An interview with Hartmut Rosa. Res Publica. Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas, 24(3), 519–523. https://doi.org/10.5209/rpub.79249

  • West, D. M. (2005). Scope, causes, and consequences of electronic government. In Digital government: Technology and public sector performance (pp. 1–21). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400835768.1

  • Zavershinskiy, K. F., & Koryushkin A. I. (2022). Political socialization in a changing society: A crisis of value orientations or asynchronization of national memories? Changing Societies & Personalities, 6(1), 35–55. https://doi.org/10.15826/csp.2022.6.1.162

  • Zavershinskiy, K. F., Koryushkin, A. I., & Czajowski, A. (2022). Political identity and national memory: The conflict of contemporary political narratives. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 38(1), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2022.107

Published
2025-04-30
How to Cite
Zavershinskiy, K., & Koryushkin, A. (2025). Dynamics of "Conservative" and "Progressive" Narratives in the Era of Digital Transformation in Political Communications. Changing Societies & Personalities, 9(1), 101–119. doi:10.15826/csp.2025.9.1.320
Citation Formats
Issue
Vol. 9, No. 1 (2025): Special Issue “Ethnic Identities in Virtual Space”
Section
Articles