The Hermeneutic Circle and Virtual Reality: Issues of Transformation
Abstract
Drawing on the methodology of traditional hermeneutics, the article examines various interpretations of the hermeneutic circle. The introduction presents the concepts of Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer, while analyzing the viewpoints of contemporary representatives of digital hermeneutics and their perspectives on the functioning of the hermeneutic circle in digital space. The research aims to identify modifications of the hermeneutic circle as the fundamental method of hermeneutics in virtual reality. Due to the emergence of new objects in the modern world of the Internet and information technologies, such as electronic texts, online communications, digital databases, and various types of artificial intelligence, hermeneutic categories and the hermeneutic circle are influenced by new trends. In order to analyze the processes of interpretation and understanding on the Internet, this article considers the concepts of the hermeneutic circle, as presented by Martin Heidegger and Hans-Georg Gadamer, to be the most applicable in the context of virtual reality. Digital hermeneutics in cyberspace faces challenges such as the elusive whole of the hermeneutic circle and its parts; user anonymity and the uncertainty of pre-understanding; and the blurring of tradition, prejudice, fusion of horizons, anticipation of perfection, and time dimension. In the conclusion, the author points to the heuristic nature of the hermeneutic circle for achieving understanding in electronic communication. Despite the dominant exchange of digital data and messages on the Internet and the proliferation of information technologies and digital databases, hermeneutics continues to study social interactions and assert the priority of humanistic values.
References
- Bielby, J., & Kelly, M. (2016). Information cultures in the digital age: A Festschrift in honor of Rafael Capurro. In M. Kelly & J. Bielby (Eds.), Information cultures in the digital age (pp. 1–28). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14681-8_1
- Boldonova, I. (2024). Hermeneutics of interpersonal communication on the Internet. Scientific Discussion, 86, 3–6. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10793007
- Capurro, R. (1996). On the genealogy of information. In K. Kornwachs & K. Jacoby (Eds.), Information. New questions to a multidisciplinary concept (pp. 259–270). Akademie Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1006/iilr.2000.0137
- Capurro, R. (2010). Digital hermeneutics: An outline. AI & Society, 25(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-009-0255-9
- Chernavin, Yu. A. (2021). Tsifrovoe obshchestvo: Teoreticheskie kontury skladyvaiushcheisia paradigmy [Digital society: Theoretical outlines of the emerging paradigm]. Digital Sociology, 4(2), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.26425/2658-347X-2021-4-2-4-12
- Curry, E. (2021, May 6). Dickens in the digital age. Victoria and Albert Museum. https://www.vam.ac.uk/blog/museum-life/dickens-in-the-digital-age
- Gadamer, H.-G. (2004). Truth and method (2nd ed., rev.; J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.). Continuum. (Originally published in German 1960)
- Introna, L. D. (1993). Information: A hermeneutic perspective. In E. A. Whitley (Ed.), Proceedings of the First European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 1993, Henley-on-Thames, United Kingdom, March 29–30, 1993 (pp. 171–179). Operational Research Society.
- Johanson, C. (2016). Making virtual worlds. In S. Schreibman, R. Siemens, & J. Unsworth (Eds.), A new companion to digital humanities (pp. 110–126). John Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118680605.ch8
- Mallery, J. C., Hurwitz, R., & Duffy, G. (1986). Hermeneutics: From textual explication to computer understanding? [AI Memo No. 871]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. https://dl.acm.org/doi/book/10.5555/888759
- Morsello, B. (2016). Digitalization of life—How technology redefine the self in the global context. EASST Review, 35(4), 94–97.
- Rettberg, S. (2016). Electronic literature as digital humanities. In S. Schreibman, R. Siemens, & J. Unsworth (Eds.), A new companion to digital humanities (pp. 127–136). John Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118680605.ch9
- Romele, A. (2020). Digital hermeneutics as hermeneutics of the self. Discipline Filosofiche, 30(2), 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1400/280037
- Romele, A., Severo M., & Furia, P. (2020). Digital hermeneutics: From interpreting with machines to interpretational machines. AI & Society, 35(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-018-0856-2
- Valeeva, G. V. (2025). Russkaia klassicheskaia literatura v epokhu tsifrovizatsii: Innovatsionnye formaty transliatsii i osobennosti vospriiatiia [Russian classical literature in the era of digitalization: Innovative transmission formats and peculiarities of perception]. Gumanitarnye Vedomosti TGPU im. L. N. Tolstogo, 4, 49–59. https://doi.org/10.22405/2304-4772-2025-4-49-59
- van de Ven, I., & van Nuenen, T. (2022). Digital hermeneutics: Scaled readings of online depression discourses. Medical Humanities, 48(3), 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2020-012104
- Vasyukov, V. L., & Shulga, E. N. (2024). Tsifrovaia ontologiia i tsifrovaia germenevtika [Digital ontology and digital hermeneutics]. Voprosy filosofii, 4, 116–125. https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2024-4-116-125
- Volodin, A. Yu. (2025). Tsifrovaia germenevtika istoricheskogo istochnika: Formalizatsiia kak tolkovanie [Digital hermeneutics of historical source: Formalization as interpretation]. Perm University Herald. History, 2, 87–100. https://doi.org/10.17072/2219-3111-2025-2-87-100
- Winograd, T. (1980). What does it mean to understand natural language? Cognitive Science, 4(3), 209–241. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0403_1
- Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1987). On understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design [A response to the reviews]. Artificial Intelligence, 31(2), 250–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(87)90026-9
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
